Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+BIG\s+array\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+BIG\s+array\s*$/: 31 ]

Total 31 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] BIG array (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:30:51 EST; Howdy -- I don't know if it's been mentioned before but I was at the SteppIR factory yesterday and saw an engineering drawing and photos of the K9LTN array. It's a 270' rotating tower with an "H" fra; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00532.html (7,906 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] BIG array (score: 1): Author: Tim Duffy K3LR <k3lr@k3lr.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:49:19 -0600; This was presented earlier this year at the Dayton Hamvention Antenna forum. You can see all 57 slides about this antenna by going to http://www.k3lr.com Click on Dayton Antenna Summary 2006 73! Tim; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00534.html (9,124 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] BIG array (score: 1): Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>; Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:50:48 -0500; Wow, that's over the top! Great looking array though... _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00535.html (6,578 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] BIG array (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:35:03 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Other than getting into the Guinness Book of World Records, one has to wonder why anyone would bother with such a project. It's the old story of the more gain yo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00537.html (8,091 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] BIG array (score: 1): Author: Rick Scott <w7psk@w7psk.net>; Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:57:55 -0800; To me its a big waste of money _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00539.html (8,093 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] BIG array (score: 1): Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:13:33 -0700; I would hope that they could split of specific antennas for various purposes. 4 over 4 over 4 on 20 and 4 over 4 over 4 on 15 would be pretty nice! Being that they are SteppIR's they can be anything; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00540.html (9,890 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] BIG array (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:22:26 EST; Wow, that's over the top! Great looking array though...de N3OX. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Yes, it is a great looking array and it looks like the owner and desig; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00541.html (8,291 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] BIG array (score: 1): Author: kd4e <kd4e@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:18:06 -0500; Mahalo Bill! How is Hawaii's newest Ham loving life there? It is 62F here in Florida. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ... somewhere in FL URL: bibleseven (dot) com _______________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00542.html (7,849 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] BIG array (score: 1): Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:34:52 -0500; Big toys for big boys. But the reasoning behind 3 over 4 over 4 escapes me. As does the expense and complexity of the H frame. Perhaps it was driven by pure gain, and the desire to hear moonbounced H; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00543.html (8,045 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] BIG array (score: 1): Author: "Jim Forsyth" <mail@jimforsyth.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:00:37 -0800; It's jealousy! Jim AF6O _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/ma; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00546.html (8,215 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] BIG array (score: 1): Author: "BRENT BAUM" <brentbaum5323@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:26:07 -0700; That is one big array. He could probably hear himself 20-40 over as his signal circles the globe except for the deep nulls on the back side. Now how can I fit the same set up in my 30 x 80 back yard.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00550.html (9,634 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] BIG array (score: 1): Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:40:48 -0600; It occurs to me that we're all in this for different reasons: some to challenge their operating skill, some to tinker and learn about semiconductors, some to tinker just for the hell of it. I suspect; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00551.html (10,820 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] BIG array (score: 1): Author: kd4e <kd4e@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:35:30 -0500; They build 'em bigger and bigger 'cause they can! It's a "guy thing". :-) I'd like to hear it as well, though with my finger on the Attenuator button! -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ... somewhere in FL; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00552.html (8,230 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] BIG array (score: 1): Author: Larry Phipps <larry@telepostinc.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:04:33 -0500; He could set the two 3el beams for 180 to listen to the return signal ;-) Larry N8LP _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00554.html (10,556 bytes)
15. Re: [TowerTalk] BIG array (score: 1): Author: "W7CE" <w7ce@curtiss.net>; Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:51:10 -0800; If he only uses on side of the array, he has a 4/4/4 stack, not an uncommon operating setup. Then if he's trying to copy a marginal signal he can add the other side to improve the signal. If I had t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00555.html (9,503 bytes)
16. [TowerTalk] BIG Array (score: 1): Author: Randall K Martin <rkmassoc@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:33:43 -0700; Definitely a monster of an array! 73 Randy K0EU _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00556.html (7,753 bytes)
17. Re: [TowerTalk] BIG array (score: 1): Author: "J. Gordon Beattie, Jr., W2TTT" <w2ttt@att.net>; Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:27:19 -0500; Jim, I agree! In every group there are those with vision, flights of fancy, adventure etc., as well as those lacking those characteristics. There are elements of the H Frame that are bigger than my l; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00558.html (10,261 bytes)
18. Re: [TowerTalk] BIG array (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:40:12 EST; As does the expense and complexity of the H frame. I was wrong. The photo at SteppIR wasn't very good. It's actually six 4 element SteppIRs. The PP presentation at the K3LR website from the Dayton An; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00559.html (8,176 bytes)
19. Re: [TowerTalk] BIG array (score: 1): Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:35:51 -0000; My only question, why go to all that trouble to stack like that with elevation control and not also provide for polarization rotation??? A few more motors, some fancy gear drives, and tilt them verti; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00561.html (10,309 bytes)
20. Re: [TowerTalk] Big Array (score: 1): Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:46:04 -0500; 4/4/4 on each side makes more sense. Someone said 3/4/4, and since there were no picture links on the URL provided, I wasn't able to see the error. Didn't take time to do a lot of exploration on the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00562.html (7,839 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]