Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+BILL\s+in\s+the\s+HOUSE\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+BILL\s+in\s+the\s+HOUSE\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] BILL in the HOUSE (score: 1): Author: "David Jordan" <wa3gin@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 09:30:29 -0400; HR 2160 IH 111th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2160 To promote and encourage the valuable public service, disaster relief, and emergency communications provided on a volunteer basis by licensees of the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00089.html (13,861 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] BILL in the HOUSE (score: 1): Author: bob finger <finger@goeaston.net>; Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 09:44:11 -0400; It is so very sad that what US citizens once took for granted and did on our own now requires legislation and the BIG Government to study, oversee, spend money on, write regulations etc etc etc. Amat; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00090.html (16,481 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] BILL in the HOUSE (score: 1): Author: Neal Campbell <nealk3nc@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 09:54:08 -0400; Please no politics. Neal k3nc _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00091.html (17,622 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] BILL in the HOUSE (score: 1): Author: bob finger <finger@goeaston.net>; Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 10:02:24 -0400; I stand corrected. The legislation is indeed TowerTalk oriented. I shot from the hip on my comment. Sorry. 73 bob de w9ge _______________________________________________ _____________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00092.html (7,587 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] BILL in the HOUSE (score: 1): Author: Alan NV8A <nv8a@att.net>; Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 10:30:17 -0400; We need *someone* to enable us to put up decent antenna systems that would be valuable in emergencies when so many municipalities and homeowners' associations are trying to make it impossible for us; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00096.html (8,955 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] BILL in the HOUSE (score: 1): Author: N7KA@comcast.net; Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 16:42:45 +0000 (UTC); We must pay close attention to this bill. It has the potential to both help and hurt our situations. Being that emergencies are usually a somewhat local event, long distant (5000 or more miles) com; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00099.html (15,520 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] BILL in the HOUSE (score: 1): Author: Dan Brown <dan@kxaz.com>; Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 10:45:57 -0700 (PDT); Gentlemen, I would greatly urge everyone to send an email and call your US Congress Representative. Ask that they not only support HR 2160 but also urge them to Co-Sponsor the bill. While a numb; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00101.html (16,323 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] BILL in the HOUSE (score: 1): Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 10:48:19 -0700 (PDT); And we already have a precedent for this, the 60 meter "band". Brings to mind the War Emergency Radio Service (WERS) during WW II. All work, no play. The last thing we need to do is to change the Ama; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00102.html (9,078 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] BILL in the HOUSE (score: 1): Author: "David Jordan" <wa3gin@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 14:16:43 -0400; Relax Rick, This is about antenna towers... --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Rick Karlquist Sent: Wednesday, May 06,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00103.html (9,279 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] Bill in the House (score: 1): Author: jim Jarvis <jimjarvis@optonline.net>; Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 15:54:13 -0400; The topic, while political, IS relevant here. And, as someone observed, since disasters tend to be local, the resulting legislation could work against regulations permitting useful structures for int; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00105.html (8,598 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] Bill in the House (score: 1): Author: GALE STEWARD <k3nd@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 13:35:06 -0700 (PDT); I agree with Jim on this. And since the local communication would most likely use frequencies in the VHF/UHF range, that's pretty much line-of-site. Therefore, the higher the antenna, the better the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00106.html (9,944 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] BILL in the HOUSE (score: 1): Author: Lawrence Melby <lemii@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 11:44:32 -0700 (PDT); Be very careful of what they actually do and say. A few years ago the Dallas City Council modified thier antenna ordinance. We were assured that it was just to prevent someone from putting a tower in; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00110.html (10,794 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] BILL in the HOUSE (score: 1): Author: Jack Parker <vhfplus@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 20:16:57 -0700; If big brother doesn't help then little brother (in the form of homeowner associations and litigious neighbors, among others) will make sure that what we have taken for granted is forever lost. I kno; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00116.html (20,154 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] BILL in the HOUSE (score: 1): Author: chas <chasm@texas.net>; Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 22:26:45 -0500; I have lived in this woman's gerrymandered district (about 5 miles wide and some 30 miles+ long stretching across North and down East side of Harris County) for almost 30 yrs and have fought to have; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00125.html (9,986 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]