Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+BPL\.\.\.\.\s+very\s+important\s+point\s+missed\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] BPL.... very important point missed (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 19:08:23 -0000
I appologize for piling on, here...but it hadn't occured to me that BPL would enable power companies to automate their meter reading. A digital back-channel, if you will. Thanks to Jim Lux for making
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00149.html (7,462 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] BPL.... very important point missed (score: 1)
Author: Bob Nielsen <nielsen@oz.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:20:18 -0800
Does anyone have details on how the power companies handle their remote meter reading? Obviously the bandwidth requirements are not very high, particularly outside the time-of-use scenario. My power
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00154.html (7,942 bytes)

3. RE: [TowerTalk] BPL.... very important point missed (score: 1)
Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 18:24:59 -0600
There are already better ways to do that... Low power RF Part 15? radios in the 900 mhz band. Not only can they do meterreading but they automatically report power outages, which wont happen when the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00202.html (9,958 bytes)

4. RE: [TowerTalk] BPL.... very important point missed (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 17:08:03 -0800
At 06:24 PM 1/9/2004 -0600, Tyler Stewart wrote: There are already better ways to do that... Low power RF Part 15? radios in the 900 mhz band. True enough, but, nobody ever said that the technically
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00204.html (17,956 bytes)

5. RE: [TowerTalk] BPL.... very important point missed (score: 1)
Author: Mark Brown <kb0pyo@direcway.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 19:24:27 -0600
BPL won't work because the customers in rural areas who are supposed to be served by it won't go near it. The power companies have a hard enough time keeping them connected ( I am one, I average 4 ou
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00205.html (18,224 bytes)

6. RE: [TowerTalk] BPL.... very important point missed (score: 1)
Author: "Tod Olson - Idaho" <tao@skypoint.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:55:44 -0700
My memory is faulty on this, but I seem to recall that in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area the meters were converted to RF reading. It was such a disaster that it was stopped. I believe that they have g
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00212.html (11,184 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] BPL.... very important point missed (score: 1)
Author: Tom Anderson <WW5L@gte.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 14:28:17 -0600
Tod: In Texas, Texas Utilities (the "corporate name" of the old Texas Electric Service Company, Texas Power and Light, and Dallas Power and Light), has both a "winter rate" and a "summer rate". Also
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00221.html (13,017 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu