Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+BX\/HDBX\s+type\s+towers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+BX\/HDBX\s+type\s+towers\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] BX/HDBX type towers (score: 1): Author: thompson@mindspring.com (David L. Thompson); Date: Tue, 3 Feb 1998 13:17:56 -0500 (EST); I have a number of posts on this type of tower over the past year. The issue seems to be the size of antenna with Rohn specs limiting the boom to 10 feet. The BX/HDBX tower is nearly 50 years old in; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00072.html (9,401 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] BX/HDBX type towers (score: 1): Author: jmarchand@ecrm.com (MarchandJohn); Date: 3 Feb 1998 14:39:15 -0400; Hi all, Just to add to David's comments, a good friend (now SK) W1PAN had an HDBX-48 up for many years, (around 20-25) which lasted thru hurricanes and 2 TH-7DX tribanders (w/ 2mtr yagis stacked abov; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00078.html (8,520 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] BX/HDBX type towers (score: 1): Author: mai@iquest.net (Patrick Croft); Date: Tue, 3 Feb 1998 15:25:18 -0500 (EST); Hi Dave, A couple comments on your post and a FYI file (or the delete). I pulled a couple older Rohn Handbooks (1972, 1978) and both showed the 10 foot boom limit statements. Thus, not really a 'rece; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00086.html (12,284 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] BX/HDBX type towers (score: 1): Author: brad4@bellatlantic.net (M.G. Brafford); Date: Tue, 3 Feb 1998 15:35:04 -0500; -- To: <towertalk@contesting.com> I have two very good friends that own the HDBX 48 towers. The towers seem to work nicely with a TA-33 style beam. However one tower got hit with a tornado type wind; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00090.html (9,550 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] BX/HDBX type towers (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (T A RUSSELL); Date: Tue, 3 Feb 1998 20:13:20 -0600; <snip> " I agree with John That they are really rough on the feet. I wonder if anyone has tried adding climbing steps?" Mick W4YV ........................ The one time I removed an HDBX tower and TH6; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00110.html (8,415 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] BX/HDBX type towers (score: 1): Author: thompson@mindspring.com (David L. Thompson); Date: Tue, 3 Feb 1998 22:30:47 -0500 (EST); One response I got back from my "history" of the BX/HDBX tower is that Leo at WRL sold 2,300 Globe Spires mostly of the 48 and 56 foot variety. They were king of the hill until the 25G came along. W9; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00111.html (8,118 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] BX/HDBX type towers (score: 1): Author: w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths); Date: Wed, 4 Feb 1998 04:28:33 -0800 (PST); Hi Gang, I looked into my Rohn catalog archives and the oldest catalog I could lay my hands on that had BX tower in it was dated May 1977. The 10 foot limit was in effect then, just as it is now. So; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00118.html (8,970 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] BX/HDBX type towers (score: 1): Author: mai@iquest.net (Patrick Croft); Date: Wed, 4 Feb 1998 11:53:07 -0500 (EST); Dave, I said the old plant WAS going until last fall, at which time Rohn completed the move to their new plant, about a mile from the original site. I also said the TV boom provided a new market for; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00132.html (8,982 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]