Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+BX\s+\"safe\"\s+load\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+BX\s+\"safe\"\s+load\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] BX "safe" load (score: 1): Author: w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths); Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 00:47:11 -0800 (PST); My personal opinion based on observing two failures where the tower folded about two thirds of the way up from the base is that a TH6DXX is too big for it . . . This is one way to zero in on the data; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00192.html (7,276 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] BX "safe" load (score: 1): Author: harpole@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu (Charles H. Harpole); Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 07:02:18 -0500 (EST); In discussing BX-style towers, no information is useful unless it specifies which sections of BX is involved. That is, BX comes in eight different eight-foot sections, named BX-1 thru BX-8, with one; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00195.html (7,973 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] BX "safe" load (score: 1): Author: TexasRF@aol.com (TexasRF@aol.com); Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 08:27:54 EST; Stan, as you probably know, there are three different models, BX rated at 6 sq ft, HBX rated at 10 sq ft and HDBX rated at 18 sq ft. Do you know which model failed with the TH6DXX antenna? Tnx/73 de; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00196.html (7,165 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] BX "safe" load (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 09:50:02 EST; The tower shown in the aforementioned photo is AX. You're the first person who has caught and mentioned the error. Nonetheless it still illustrates the X-bracing used in AX and BX-type towers. 73, St; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00198.html (7,564 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]