Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Balun$s$\s+Testing\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Balun$s$\s+Testing\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Balun(s) Testing (score: 1): Author: ne3h@access.webcombo.net (Joe Shuey NE3H); Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 17:12:27 -0400; I am building a 6 meter beam. I decided on the Antenna book arraingement of feeding this Yagi with a Hairpin match and a 4:1 balun. I have 3 baluns on hand. One is an UNADILLA ( unused ), the second; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00265.html (8,276 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Balun(s) Testing (score: 1): Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson); Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 15:47:20 -0700; To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Does the ARRL book really recommend a 4:1 balun with a hairpin match? I'd expect this to be a 1:1 balun. Yes. Can't say. Its a possibility. But... Have you tried them w; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00269.html (9,522 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Balun(s) Testing (score: 1): Author: ne3h@access.webcombo.net (Joe Shuey NE3H); Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 17:58:04 -0400; To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Yes, read section 18 of the ARRL Antenna Book. It is the 'Optimized Yagi' for 6 meters I doubted it too...> I'm not sure what difference this makes. I swept the baluns; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00326.html (10,978 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Balun(s) Testing (score: 1): Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson); Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 17:34:26 -0700; <3711103B.A57E387A@access.webcombo.net> <199904112247.PAA25378@toontown.mmsi.com> <37126C6B.ED73BA96@access.webcombo.net> Sender: owner-towertalk@contesting.com Precedence: bulk X-List-Info: http://w; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00330.html (10,372 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Balun(s) Testing (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 12:10:31 -0400; It indeed uses a hairpin match, almost a clone of the HiGain 66 which has been described in several VHF pubs as a rather inefficient performer. Changing the DE to an all metal T Match as used by CC; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00345.html (8,836 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Balun(s) Testing (score: 1): Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson); Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 11:28:20 -0700; To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Snip... I read the antenna book entry for this antenna. They do indeed specify a 4:1 balun for feeding this thing. And, it is indeed _not_ a T-match or floded dipole el; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00348.html (9,789 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Balun(s) Testing (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 10:53:56 -0400; Eric, The DE mounting method would appear to be marginal for QRO or rain also. I've built many HF and VHF antennas and would not want to use the specified phenolic or G-10 in that application. In add; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00378.html (10,345 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]