Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Balun\s+For\s+Dipole\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Balun\s+For\s+Dipole\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Balun For Dipole (score: 1): Author: "AD5VJ Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 12:22:15 -0500; I am making a dipole that I am pulling to the top of my tower and am wanting to make my own BALUN for it as well, what size (diameter/thickness) toroidal core should I buy in order to make a full leg; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00024.html (7,356 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Balun For Dipole (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 13:44:05 -0400; WEb search for Jim Brown/s articles on toroids and baluns. I believe he has some good articles detailing what size and what material to use. Maybe here: http://www.audiosystemsgroup.com/RFI-Ham.pdf h; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00026.html (7,538 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Balun For Dipole (score: 1): Author: "AD5VJ Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 12:49:38 -0500; GREAT INFORMATION THANKS Bob AD5VJ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contest; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00027.html (7,794 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Balun For Dipole (score: 1): Author: "W3YY" <w3yy@cox.net>; Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 10:58:34 -0800; Bob - I'm not a balun expert, but would recommend you try the Palomar BA-8. I've been using them here. They seem to work and there are no delicate windings that might arc over under higher SWR condit; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00028.html (8,584 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Balun For Dipole (score: 1): Author: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>; Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 11:41:11 -0700; I agree with: Bob - I'm not a balun expert, but would recommend you try the Palomar BA-8. I've been using them here. They seem to work and there are no delicate windings that might arc over under hig; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00034.html (8,500 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Balun For Dipole (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 12:14:08 -0700; I AM a balun expert, and I don't recommend them at all. They are a total rip-off! Overpriced and ineffective. So they don't blow up. But they don't do anything useful either. 73, Jim Brown K9YC _____; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00038.html (8,124 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Balun For Dipole (score: 1): Author: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>; Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 12:52:17 -0700; Is the BA-8 that much different than the BA-58's? The '58 does decouple the feed line from the vertical dipole arrays by my field observation, and that is why I use them. The routing on the feed line; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00045.html (8,555 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Balun For Dipole (score: 1): Author: "W3YY" <w3yy@cox.net>; Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 15:20:08 -0800; Jim - Just one follow-up question, and I don't mean as a defense of the BA-8 or similar baluns. I'm just curious. The BA-8 appears to be an implementation of a balun design that appears it the ARRL A; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00064.html (9,191 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] Balun For Dipole (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 15:54:31 -0700; The Palomar "balun" is a VERY poor imitation of W2DU's ferrite bead "balun," which is fundamentally a common mode choke. W2DU's design (from roughly 30 years ago) is solid, but my enhancements of it; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00068.html (8,563 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] Balun For Dipole (score: 1): Author: "Robert" <rgshauger@myyellowstone.net>; Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 16:36:13 -0700; Ah, the dragon has raised his head breathing fire. hi hi Bob W7KD _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@cont; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00072.html (9,338 bytes)
11. [TowerTalk] Balun For Dipole (score: 1): Author: "Darl Deeds" <ddeeds@thewavz.com>; Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 18:26:40 -0400; Jim They're "a rip off" "ineffective" "overpriced" etc. Please tell me in your opinion what would be a good one? Darl NA8W _______________________________________________ ____________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00091.html (8,281 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] Balun For Dipole (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 20:35:48 -0700; The one you wind yourself with some turns of coax through a ferrite toroid, following the instructions in my "choke cookbook." http://audiosystemsgroup.com/RFI-Ham.pdf 73, Jim Brown K9YC ____________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00095.html (8,572 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] Balun For Dipole (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 08:43:43 -0700; Don't know yet. I've got something like 50 written. It should be a very good one, a major update. There are some excellent authors working on it, including Rudy Severns, Jim Lux, Ward Silver, and Ste; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00124.html (8,706 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] Balun For Dipole (score: 1): Author: Michael Germino <ad6aa@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 08:31:27 -0700 (PDT); Jim, You really need to think about a hardcopy book, one of these days. How many pages are going to have in the Handbook? I may just get me a newer Handbook. Mike AD6AA ______________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00170.html (10,140 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]