Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Balun\s+testing\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Balun\s+testing\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Balun testing (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 10:20:08 EDT; I believe you can use the MFJ 259 to check out a balun. Also, an ohm meter can be used to check continuity between the center and the ground. I lost a KLM balun which 'exploded' on the inside when hi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00508.html (6,828 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] balun testing (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 11:26:15 -0800; On 11/22/15 9:53 AM, Steve Hunt wrote: Unfortunately that test doesn't subject the balun to the maximum CM stress it might experience in a typical application - at worst it subjects the balun to a CM; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-11/msg00221.html (10,904 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] balun testing (score: 1): Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@ca.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:06:59 -0800; On 11/22/2015 11:26 AM, Jim Lux wrote: On 11/22/15 9:53 AM, Steve Hunt wrote: Unfortunately that test doesn't subject the balun to the maximum CM stress it might experience in a typical application -; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-11/msg00227.html (12,266 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] balun testing (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:34:39 -0800; On 11/25/15 11:06 AM, Michael Tope wrote: On 11/22/2015 11:26 AM, Jim Lux wrote: On 11/22/15 9:53 AM, Steve Hunt wrote: Unfortunately that test doesn't subject the balun to the maximum CM stress it m; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-11/msg00228.html (12,128 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] balun testing (score: 1): Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 20:21:47 +0000; You must take account of the reactive components. If you have only a resistive load, no matter how much you unbalance it you can never generate a CM voltage across the balun higher than the different; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-11/msg00229.html (10,747 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] balun testing (score: 1): Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 12:06:51 -0800; On 11/25/2015 11:34 AM, Jim Lux wrote: On 11/25/15 11:06 AM, Michael Tope wrote: On 11/22/2015 11:26 AM, Jim Lux wrote: On 11/22/15 9:53 AM, Steve Hunt wrote: Unfortunately that test doesn't subject; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-11/msg00230.html (13,605 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] balun testing (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 13:16:09 -0800; On 11/25/15 12:21 PM, Steve Hunt wrote: You must take account of the reactive components. If you have only a resistive load, no matter how much you unbalance it you can never generate a CM voltage ac; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-11/msg00231.html (12,829 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] balun testing (score: 1): Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 22:15:28 +0000; Take a look at the voltages in the example I worked using your impedances. There would be no difficulty at all designing balun windings to handle the 452v rms (639v peak) differential-mode signal for; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-11/msg00232.html (10,141 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]