Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Basic\s+tower\s+installation\s+question\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Basic tower installation question (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@windstream.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:29:21 -0500
I live in an 80-mph wind zone and am going to put up a 70 foot Rohn 45G tower, using 3/16 EHS for the lower guys and HPTG6700 for the top guys. I will have a 22-foot DOM 1026 mast with a 6.8 sq. ft.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00180.html (7,535 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Basic tower installation question (score: 1)
Author: Jim Hoge <knowkode@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:18:37 -0800 (PST)
You're overloaded, even for 70mph winds. There will be considerable torque exerted on the tower so consider a star bracket at the top guy point and a pier pin base if you want to go ahead and exceed
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00183.html (6,889 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Basic tower installation question (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:25:25 -0700
Tom: Unless I am mistaken an "80 mph wind zone" will have 3 sec gusts of about 100 mph as a part of the 80 mph wind. To be totally comfortable with your installation I would think you would want to d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00186.html (11,367 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Basic tower installation question (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:47:08 -0500
TT: Didn't someone here post a few years back that there was an error in Frank's spreadsheet calcs? Anyone know what they are? 73 de Gene Smar AD3F _______________________________________________ ___
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00188.html (8,260 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Basic tower installation question (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:23:09 -0700
Gene: There was a Letter to the QEX Editor from DJ0IA [Jan-Feb 2003, p.60] commenting on the fact that the calculations did not take into account the effect of icing -- which is correct. The calculat
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00192.html (10,476 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Basic tower installation question (score: 1)
Author: Jim Hoge <knowkode@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:43:08 -0800 (PST)
Tom,   I stand corrected. It's high time I admit to the need for bifocals rather than removing my glasses to read (which doesn't work very well either). I am however fond of star bracketing a tower w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00193.html (7,887 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Basic tower installation question (score: 1)
Author: N4NW <n4nw@n4nw.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:12:43 -0500
The pier-point base has the advantage that you do not need to be concerned about water draining from the legs embedded in concrete. I have a 110' Rohn with a pier-point base that has been up twenty y
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00194.html (9,544 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Basic tower installation question (score: 1)
Author: "James Wolf" <jbwolf@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:04:44 -0400
Tom, I'd go with the pier pin or a rooftop base on a flat cement slab. Use long bolts in the cement to bolt the rooftop base to. I see no value in sinking tower sections in cement. Jim, KR9U ________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00230.html (8,533 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Basic tower installation question (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:31:09 -0500
For years the concrete base was standard on smaller towers which tend to be more flexible. ROHN still recommends that approach for bracketed towers, but the pier pin base for taller, guyed towers. Us
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00233.html (10,013 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu