Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Battle\s+of\s+the\s+bearings\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Battle of the bearings (score: 1)
Author: Mike <nf4l_NO_SPAM@nf4l.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:26:38 -0400
I like to get thoughts/experiences about Rohn TB3 bearings vs. Glenn Martin TB25. The antennae will be a 4 element SteppIR and an M2 6M7JHV on 20 feet of 2" chrom-moly. I plan to use 2 bearings. Can
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00234.html (6,751 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Battle of the bearings (score: 1)
Author: "Tod -ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:08:05 -0600
This URL will carry you to an IPTCI bearing in the model series NANF. These bearings have 4 holes rather than two holes and have an eccentric locking collar. The price quoted here in potato country i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00235.html (8,913 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Battle of the bearings (score: 1)
Author: Mike <nf4l_NO_SPAM@nf4l.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:45:37 -0400
Thanks Tod. Looks like they only sell to dealers? Mike _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00254.html (9,458 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Battle of the bearings (score: 1)
Author: saul_abrams@dps.state.ny.us
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:37:41 -0400
To get the correct bearing use the URL and then change the shaft diameter to '2S in' . http://www.iptci.com/store/product/2/15917?s=2+in&e=B I have no pecuniary interest in these bearing -- only know
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00268.html (7,799 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Battle of the bearings (score: 1)
Author: N4NW <n4nw@n4nw.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:29:24 -0400
The problem with the bearings you indicate is that they are not 'thrust bearings!" A thrust bearing is a particular type of rotary <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bearing_%28mechanical%29>bearing. Like
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00271.html (10,697 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Battle of the bearings (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:12:19 -0700
true. but I think most "ham" thrust bearings are regular old radial load ball bearings with the races parallel to the shaft. A standard bearing will take a fairly substantial axial load, and the rota
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00272.html (8,834 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Battle of the bearings (score: 1)
Author: Mike <nf4l_NO_SPAM@nf4l.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 05:54:28 -0400
Thanks for the ideas and discussion guys. Food for thought. Can anyone address the 2 points I asked about? Rohn vs Glenn Martin bearings: http://www.texastowers.com/rohn_tb.htm http://www.glenmartin.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00276.html (8,832 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Battle of the bearings (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 16:53:06 -0400
Remember it's a ROHN shelf in a ROHN tower with a ROHN bearing. According the ROHN the bearing is for side loads and as it's a complete ROHN system I'd stick with their recommendations. IOW the shelf
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00280.html (11,352 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Battle of the bearings (score: 1)
Author: Mike <nf4l_NO_SPAM@nf4l.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 21:38:51 -0400
The idea that the bearing is designed to obviate lateral motion just doesn't make sense to me. I believe it's there to take the vertical load. I wonder if a PE came up with the idea the bearing was f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00287.html (10,750 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Battle of the bearings (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 00:51:13 -0400
That used to be my understanding, but with the ROHN bearings I have to go with their instructions...(Prime directive). OTOH tapered bearings like wheel bearings are made to take lateral and axial for
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00291.html (11,762 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Battle of the bearings (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 12:09:29 -0400
The rotator has a bearing which should suffice in most installations and there are no one bearing fulcrum installations unless the rotator is mounted above the tower. If the rotator bearing is inadeq
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00295.html (8,677 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Battle of the bearings (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 13:18:43 -0400
Please watch the attributes, you quoted the the text I answered, but the header makes it look like It's an answer from me. <:-)) 73 Roger (K8RI) _______________________________________________ ______
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00296.html (9,787 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu