Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Beam\s+height\s+suggestions\s+wanted\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Beam height suggestions wanted (score: 1)
Author: "Tom and Linda Hellem" <redpines@cybrzn.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 18:02:10 -0600
Gentlemen: If you were going to put up monoband antennas for 10, 15, and 20 on separate towers and they were going to be used primarily for domestic contesting, what heights would you put them at? An
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00040.html (7,467 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Beam height suggestions wanted (score: 1)
Author: Peter Larsen <ve6yc@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 17:24:25 -0800
I would put them at 1 wave length each. Good high angle take off as well as a good lower lobe. (30 and 60 degrees if I remember right) Peter VE6YC _______________________________________________ See
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00041.html (7,058 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Beam height suggestions wanted (score: 1)
Author: David O Hachadorian <k6ll@juno.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 19:57:54 -0700
Five minutes with the program YT (comes with the arrl antenna book), using arrival angle statistics for Iowa to USA, produces the following results, assuming flat terrain: 10m - 45' 15m - 55' 20m - 7
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00042.html (7,569 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Beam height suggestions wanted (score: 1)
Author: dan bookwalter <n8dcj@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 05:16:51 -0800 (PST)
If i remember these were all going on seperate towers... you could always use stacks .... that way you can move the angles all around depending on condx... especially on 10 ..... good luck Dan N8DCJ
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00043.html (9,414 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Beam height suggestions wanted (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hough" <dlhough@citlink.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 08:52:14 -0800
Quads are comfortable at just about any height. You'd like to have them above nearby obstructions if possible but that's about all. Yagi's on the other hand like to be from .7 to 1.2 wavelengths abov
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00048.html (9,301 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Beam height suggestions wanted (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Playford" <w8aef@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:35:00 -0000
I have 4 element W2PV design monobanders stacked on my 72 foot crankup. And I have a Force 12 C3 on a 37 foot tubular crankup. During domestic contests I find the C3 outperforms the monobanders from
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00049.html (9,010 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Beam height suggestions wanted (score: 1)
Author: "David L. Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 01:43:24 -0500
I won the ARRL SS three times with a tri-bander at 48 feet and wires. Once I got my 72 foot tower I found that hams at 40 to 50 feet would beat me out to Central America. That is why multi ops have s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00069.html (8,133 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu