Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Beverage\s+Antenna\s*$/: 74 ]

Total 74 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Don " <w7wll@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 19:24:01 -0800
With a few hundred thousand acres of National Forest behind me I have the opportunity to put up an almost unlimited length Beverage ranging from about 10 degrees through 170 degrees (basically easter
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00558.html (10,002 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Aycock" <billaycock@mediacombb.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 22:17:20 -0600
David-- How did you find my household motto? Bill--W4BSG If its worth doing, its worth over doing! David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net web: http://wiki.k1ttt.net <http://wiki.k1ttt.net/
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00562.html (14,965 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage Antenna (score: 1)
Author: Patrick Greenlee <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 05:16:31 -0600
This PVC pipe over T posts sounds like a workable solution. It will elevate the wire sufficiently that I can drive a tractor under it. An alternative is to elevate the Beverage wire 6-8 ft above a wi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00566.html (21,124 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 12:08:54 +0000
The low height keeps it in-efficient... that is one of the keys to Beverages, they need the ground to do what they do best. If you get it too high it will act more like a plain long wire and will be
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00567.html (11,443 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage Antenna (score: 1)
Author: Patrick Greenlee <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 06:34:44 -0600
Sorry , David, but I don't understand. You say in-efficient at low height and then say higher from ground and it looses Beverage action and becomes more of just a long nwire antenna. I'm not being a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00568.html (12,073 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage Antenna (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 09:13:21 -0800
That's pretty common out here in California -- someone showed it to me, and I'm using quite successfully both for Beverages and to elevate radials. I cut the steel to about 4 ft, stick it in the grou
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00578.html (9,152 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage Antenna (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 09:19:40 -0800
That's very different from my experience, David. My 550 ft reversible Beverage hears pretty good as high as 20M -- I used it a lot to hear EU before I had aluminum in the air, and I still use it up t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00580.html (10,546 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage Antenna (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 12:41:37 -0600
Another alternative: Drill about a 5/16 inch through hole in the PVC about 1/2 to 1 inch down from the end and then cut a slot about the width of the wire diameter between the top of the holes and th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00584.html (9,644 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage Antenna (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:29:44 -0500
A Beverage is ground dependant. I am sure that there is good explanation on how this antenna works in the ARRL Antenna book and the ON4UN low band book. John KK9A Sorry , David, but I don't understan
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00586.html (8,660 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage Antenna (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:33:25 -0500
PVC pipe is a good method. I pound fiberglass posts into the ground and attach the wire using plastic electric fence clamps from a farm store. John KK9A This PVC pipe over T posts sounds like a worka
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00589.html (8,401 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage Antenna (score: 1)
Author: Chuck Dietz <w5prchuck@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 17:56:45 -0600
The noise is mostly locally produced, therefore the lower the antenna, the less noise pickup. The distant signal is coming from a slightly higher angle and, while it will be a smaller amplitude for a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00593.html (10,147 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Don " <w7wll@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 17:07:46 -0800
This theme seems to be that a Beverage needs to be low to reduce noise,s been stated several times by several different people over time on this reflector. Surely a moer scientific study has been don
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00595.html (11,647 bytes)

33. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage Antenna (score: 1)
Author: <samsadventure@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2015 01:47:06 +0000
read here: http://www.w8ji.com/beverages.htm Sent from Windows Mail This theme seems to be that a Beverage needs to be low to reduce noise,s been stated several times by several different people over
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00598.html (12,020 bytes)

34. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage Antenna (score: 1)
Author: Mike <mikek4gmh@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 08:25:16 -0500
Hello Hans, Been using NE and W Beverages for over 10 years. Both are run through the surrounding woods and follow sloping terrain. The wire is aluminum electric fence wire, probably 17 gauge. Cost a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00600.html (14,006 bytes)

35. [TowerTalk] Beverage Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2015 21:01:45 -0800
read here: http://www.w8ji.com/beverages.htm That implies 26.86 feet. 492 / 1.832 = 268.55 feet. 268.55 / 10 = 26.86 feet. 6 ft tall fence line and strap a 8-15 ft tall pvc tube to each wooden fence
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00025.html (7,195 bytes)

36. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Turnbull" <turnbull@net1.ie>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 05:41:14 -0500
Dear OMs, This is the maximum height and 0.05 is 1/20 so you should have a maximum height of 13 feet. Not many people use the Beverages this high - they may work but is performance impaired? The w8JI
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00027.html (8,689 bytes)

37. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Turnbull" <turnbull@net1.ie>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 05:51:14 -0500
Dear OMs, Another point to consider is that while 13 feet might be okay for 160M, it is too high for 80 and 40 meters. 73 Doug EI2CN 0.05 = 1/20 That implies 26.86 feet. 492 / 1.832 = 268.55 feet. 26
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00029.html (7,350 bytes)

38. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage Antenna (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 05:23:57 -0600
Doug, Thanks for the contact in 160m Contest. I was ZF2DX that weekend. .05 = 1/20 but VE7RF, for some reason, calculated a half wavelength instead of a wavelength and then divided by 10 instead of 2
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00031.html (9,438 bytes)

39. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Turnbull" <turnbull@net1.ie>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 06:28:00 -0500
Hi Stan, Yes of course you are right and so too was VE7RF to whom I apologize with a red face. The comment though about also wanting to use the Beverage for 80/40 though is still valid; I hope. 73 Do
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00032.html (9,984 bytes)

40. [TowerTalk] Beverage Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 03:34:30 -0800
984 / 1.832 = 537.11 feet. 537.11 / 20 = 26.86 feet. 13.43 feet is the max you could go on 80m. 6.72 feet is the max for 40m. Flip side is 2 wavelengths on 160m is 4 wavelengths on 80, etc. beverage
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00033.html (9,516 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu