Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Beverage\s+Layout\s+Problem\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Beverage Layout Problem (score: 1)
Author: rfman45 <rfman45@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 12:50:22 -0500
I have a question concerning feedline runs which I'd like to present to the group. I have four beverages with the feeds on one side (front) of my property and my tower and other transmitting antennas
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00237.html (7,732 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage Layout Problem (score: 1)
Author: Jim Miller <jtmiller47@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 18:09:17 -0400
Beverage loss on any reasonable rg6 is near zero on low bands. 73 Jim ab3cv I have a question concerning feedline runs which I'd like to present to the group. I have four beverages with the feeds on
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00239.html (8,600 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage Layout Problem (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@Earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 04:00:27 -0400
I would bring them in with the shortest run of coax, tie the #2 to your ground at entrance for the lowest feedline loss and use low loss feedline (also helps with noise pick up ? remember ?snake ante
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00246.html (7,701 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage Layout Problem (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 06:11:53 -0500
The extra coax loss is not a factor for an RX antenna. 200 feet of RG8X has 3/4 dB loss on top band. How is the rest of the station connected to the single point ground? John KK9A I have a question c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00250.html (8,934 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage Layout Problem (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@Earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 09:55:10 -0400
Personally, I use my beverages extensively on 40 - 160M and the 200 ft of low loss cable would be really important. Also, not sure if you have ever tried this experiment: Preamp at the radio (mine is
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00255.html (7,970 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage Layout Problem (score: 1)
Author: "Earl Morse" <kz8e@wt.net>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 07:56:51 -0700
http://www.w4rp.com/ref/coax.html RG174 would even be usable on 160m, not great but useable. The beverages I built for XA5T were fed with a couple 100 feet of RG58. We only had to listen to the US so
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00259.html (10,362 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage Layout Problem (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 08:34:24 -0700
You're going to have to explain that some more for it to make any sense. The total cable loss for 200 feet of RG-213 at 7 MHz is about 1 db. It seems to me that you'd have to have some really horribl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00260.html (9,804 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage Layout Problem (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@Earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 12:07:42 -0400
You're going to have to explain that some more for it to make any sense. The total cable loss for 200 feet of RG-213 at 7 MHz is about 1 db. It seems to me that you'd have to have some really horribl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00263.html (9,241 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage Layout Problem (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 09:18:23 -0700
Can you come up with a scientific explanation for why lossy coax picks up more noise than does a lower loss coax? I can't. And if you are able to do that, can you come up with a scientific explanatio
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00264.html (10,639 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage Layout Problem (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 22:28:17 -0700
Coax with a poor shield can convert common mode shield current to differential voltage between center and shield. The standard measure of this is the Transfer Impedance of the shield, and the lower l
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00301.html (9,486 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu