- 1. [TowerTalk] Big crank-up? (score: 1)
- Author: K7LXC@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 11:24:48 EDT
- included) would not help with the requirements that I had to meet here in Broward county Florida which is a 140 mph, 3 second area. He gave me all of the information that I needed to provide to a loc
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00072.html (7,623 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] Big crank-up? (score: 1)
- Author: "Todd Coulter" <coulter@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:51:45 +0000
- Steve, I was allowed to have the tower rated in the retracted or nested position. This was the key to meeting the requirements as set by the Florida Building Code with a crank-up tower. My point was
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00077.html (9,583 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] Big crank-up? (score: 1)
- Author: "Leigh Sedgwick" <bipi@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 17:37:18 -0700
- Any wind strong enough to damage my tower in a retracted position will level my house first! I'd go strap myself to the tower :-) 73 de Mike K7PI _______________________________________________ _____
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00092.html (10,645 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu