Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Birds\s+and\s+PVC\s+on\s+Antennas\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Birds\s+and\s+PVC\s+on\s+Antennas\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Birds and PVC on Antennas (score: 1): Author: Rolf Moberg <rolf.moberg@dnainternet.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 13:52:45 +0300; You should never install PVC to your antenna systems. PVC and RF field "are not friends", even some US manufacturers (SteppIR) uses PVC in amateur antennas. I cannot explain is it extra loss due to p; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00822.html (7,651 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Birds and PVC on Antennas (score: 1): Author: "Richard M. Gillingham" <rmoodyg@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 07:27:50 -0400; Where'ss the PVC in SteppIr antennas?? Just curious. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com ht; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00823.html (8,470 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Birds and PVC on Antennas (score: 1): Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 07:12:04 -0500; I'm not sure I buy this, Rolf. I work plenty of guys with PVC in their antennas. My antennas have PVC in them. Are you saying we'd all be louder without it? Something tells me that in practical appli; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00824.html (7,512 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Birds and PVC on Antennas (score: 1): Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 09:33:44 -0400; variable depending on the additives included. I've used it for all sorts of antenna applications and not had a problem, but I've never stressed it more than using it for end insulators on a dipole w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00825.html (8,474 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Birds and PVC on Antennas (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 06:57:36 -0700; Not all PVC pipe is the same, and especially so for PVC in general. PVC is fairly low loss at RF (e.g. a heck of a lot better than, say, glass) but has two notable "gotcha's": 1) It can be hygroscopi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00827.html (9,218 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Birds and PVC on Antennas (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 21:13:12 -0700; I've used it for all sorts of antenna applications and not had a ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Doesn't the Screwdriver mobile antenna have PVC for the base? Maybe that part don't rad; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00844.html (8,353 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]