Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Bobtail\-Curtain\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Bobtail\-Curtain\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Bobtail-Curtain (score: 1): Author: carsten.esch@olympus-software.com (OLYMPUS Support Group); Date: Thu, 11 Dec 1997 09:47:00 -0800; Hi, I am thinking about building a Bobtail-Curtain antenna for 80m (maybe another for 160m too). Reading in two different sources, one states to try a high L/C ratio for the L/C tuning network, the o; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00231.html (7,436 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Bobtail-Curtain (score: 1): Author: cebik@utkux.utcc.utk.edu (L. B. Cebik); Date: Thu, 11 Dec 1997 06:52:03 -0500 (EST); Carsten, It appears that you plan to feed the bobtail curtain at the bottom of the center vertical. There is an alternative: feed the top of the center vertical, where the impedance will be close to; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00233.html (7,737 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Bobtail-Curtain (score: 1): Author: thompson@mindspring.com (David L. Thompson); Date: Thu, 11 Dec 1997 14:14:09 -0500 (EST); Don't bother with the critical values for an LC network. Attach the feedline to the top of the vertical element and it comes close to 50 ohms and you can QSY further without building up a large RF cu; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00253.html (8,330 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Bobtail-Curtain (score: 1): Author: ve6jy@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca (Don Moman); Date: Thu, 11 Dec 1997 21:18:22 -0700 (MST); Having had two bobtails up for 80m (2 years) and just having put one up this summer for 160m.... Mine are bottom fed with tapped coil(very roughly maybe 25-35 turns 2-2.5 inch diameter air wound, ta; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00274.html (8,743 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]