Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Boom\s+correction\s+6m\s+SQ\s+boom\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Boom\s+correction\s+6m\s+SQ\s+boom\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Boom correction 6m SQ boom (score: 1): Author: "Dan" <longterm@chatusa.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:33:41 -0800; Looking for boom correction for 1.5 inch Sq. boom 6m with insulated .625 inch elements elevated above boom .25 inches. 73 NN7J _______________________________________________ ________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00560.html (8,061 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Boom correction 6m SQ boom (score: 1): Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 07:49:33 +0100; Almost zero - don't worry about it. In more detail: if the element ran through the centre of the boom, electrically connected on both sides, the correction would be about 0.15x the boom cross-section; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00561.html (9,901 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Boom correction 6m SQ boom (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:41:21 -0400; I think you're referring to modeling boom correction. I don't think that the boom has any effect and I would ignore it. John KK9A Looking for boom correction for 1.5 inch Sq. boom 6m with insulated .; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00569.html (6,929 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]