Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Bounces\s+replies\-\-\-\s+tnx\s+to\s+all\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Bounces replies--- tnx to all (score: 1)
Author: jimjarvis@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 19:43:22 +0000
Guys... Thanks to all who responded with thoughts on why I see the bounce from geo888@cs.com. In short, the reason is that geo888.cs.com is still registered as a user, but the address is no longer va
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00088.html (7,015 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Bounces replies--- tnx to all (score: 1)
Author: <kk9a@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 22:21:52 -0000
I believe that geo888@cs.com was a registered user of towertalk using an alias email address. The system administrator does not know what his alias was and therefore cannot delete him. I doubt he's s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00093.html (8,108 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Bounces replies--- tnx to all (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 16:26:57 -0800
It's been like that for months. With every post you get the geo888@cs.com bounce message. Just something to ignore until its fixed. jimjarvis@comcast.net wrote: Guys... Thanks to all who responded wi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00098.html (9,407 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Bounces replies--- tnx to all (score: 1)
Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 19:59:05 -0500
If geo888@cs.com was in the user database, the reflector software would have cancelled the address itself. This problem is because someone registered a forwarding address as the user to Towertalk, an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00100.html (11,931 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu