Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Bracketed\s+but\s+Unguyed\s+Monopole\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Bracketed\s+but\s+Unguyed\s+Monopole\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Bracketed but Unguyed Monopole (score: 1): Author: WT4BT-Barclay Thomas <wt4bt@blomand.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 15:08:48 -0500; My aim: Vertical support for a Hexbeam at about 30-35 feet. Space for guys is severely limited by property lines, trees and other structures I cannot use a lattice type tower for several reasons. Gro; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00269.html (8,519 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Bracketed but Unguyed Monopole (score: 1): Author: "Steve Jones" <n6sj@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:31:00 -0700; Mac I had a 40' tall Rohn 25 supporting my 2-element cubical quad for many years. No guy wires. Survived 75 mph gusts. It had a house bracket under the eaves. If your soil is a problem you might be a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00272.html (9,727 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Bracketed but Unguyed Monopole (score: 1): Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 09:47:29 -0400; It sounds like you have even harder soil than I do! I think that bracketed tubular crankup towers are available. Actually Rohn 25 would probably work perfectly if you were not against lattice towers; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00279.html (9,015 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Bracketed but Unguyed Monopole (score: 1): Author: TexasRF--- via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 10:35:38 -0400; Mac, this can be analyzed with one of the mast calculators. Assuming a robust bracket 12ft above the ground level and the antenna about 5 sq ft, mounted at 35ft above ground, that leaves 23 ft unsupp; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00280.html (10,625 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Bracketed but Unguyed Monopole (score: 1): Author: WT4BT-Barclay Thomas <wt4bt@blomand.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 21:12:45 -0500; Steve/N6SJ, thanks for the info. Unfortunately a Rohn 25, or similar, is out of the picture. A tower per se wont pass muster from the XYL. The mat foundation idea may be put to use though. Thanks and; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00290.html (7,870 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Bracketed but Unguyed Monopole (score: 1): Author: WT4BT-Barclay Thomas <wt4bt@blomand.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 09:50:41 -0500; Thanks Gerald, thats the kind of info I was looking for. I just wasnt sure where to find it. Now to do some materials searching and put that into the mix. Taking my time on this one, hurrying usually; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00291.html (7,946 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]