Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Breaking\s+up\s+guy\s+wires\s+for\s+nonresonance\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Breaking up guy wires for nonresonance (score: 1)
Author: w5kp@swbell.net (Jerry W5KP)
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2001 12:46:57 -0500
Latest in my series of questions, which you guys have been extremely helpful in answering: Is there any reason to go to the trouble of putting a "stub" of guy wire at the top with an insulator on it,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00045.html (9,394 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Breaking up guy wires for nonresonance (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider)
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 18:10:17 +0100
Jerry, Take a look at the tradeoff analysis I have on my Website, specifically, the break-up insulator, Phillistran, and fiberglass rod implementations. I chose the fiberglass rod implementation in p
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00046.html (11,414 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Breaking up guy wires for nonresonance (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 06:18:51 -0600
Guy Insulator Placement de N4KG (Feb 2000) The following lengths between insulators have resonances between the conventional bands (which places their resonancesin the WARC bands :-) - 27, 40, 58, an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00063.html (10,236 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Breaking up guy wires for nonresonance (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 10:19:12 -0400
That is not necessarily where the problem is. The guy wire can be resonant with the electrical length of the tower at the attachment point, and not even involve another guy wire. When you attach a g
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00072.html (10,351 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Breaking up guy wires for nonresonance (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 18:06:44 EDT
The posts below show the questions that still exist on the need of breaking up guy wires. N7WA got it right. Some time ago I gave info on TT of Eznec patterns I ran of different length guy wires belo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00083.html (19,860 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Breaking up guy wires for nonresonance (score: 1)
Author: millersg@dmapub.dma.org (Steve Miller)
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 11:06:10 -0400 (EDT)
<snip> <snip> In some cases, K7GCO is right on the mark. However depending on the installation, there are valid reasons (not "band aids") to use nonconductive guy wires (or EHS broken up with insulat
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00101.html (11,266 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] Breaking up guy wires for nonresonance (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 07:12:23 -0600
N4KG comments inserted in text below coax directly of a guy 10' SNIP this in self. wires toward the OK so far. Here's where we disagree. What you say is true for Beams AT THE TOP of the Tower ONLY. W
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00105.html (12,502 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] Breaking up guy wires for nonresonance (score: 1)
Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 15:48:23 -0400
guy Actually, NOT ok. The typical image we form in our mind of a beams pattern is a FAR FIELD pattern, that is to say when we are far enough away from the beam that the sum of the radiations from th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00109.html (11,562 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] Breaking up guy wires for nonresonance (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 18:25:42 EDT
Steve: You are absolutely right on your statements below. I addressed only the one beam on top of the tower. My 5 conditions zero'd in on it although it applies to other beams at a distance for refle
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00113.html (13,249 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] Breaking up guy wires for nonresonance (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 19:00:16 EDT
guy wires is greatly attenuated and any reflected RF is attenuated again back beam is from surrounding objects to the side/back and below. It just doesn't see Actually, NOT ok. The typical image we f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00114.html (12,443 bytes)

11. [TowerTalk] Breaking up guy wires for nonresonance (score: 1)
Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 23:33:37 -0400
Ken blends a number of things together in his post. Let's separate them out: Proportions are at issue. Most of the time I have seen a tribander and a two meter 10 element or some such up together, th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00115.html (16,028 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] Breaking up guy wires for nonresonance (score: 1)
Author: alsopb@gloryroad.net (alsopb)
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 10:32:37 +0000
What Guy is saying is: There is a million ways to do it wrong and shoot yourself in the foot. There are only a few ways to do it right. Absent any concrete data or analysis proving you've done it rig
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00119.html (18,534 bytes)

13. [TowerTalk] Breaking up guy wires for nonresonance (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 07:52:53 EDT
is a must and will eliminate RF Spill Over transfer to the guys from the tower and coax shield. There can still be RF coupling from the beam to a guy directly underneath even with the insulator at th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00122.html (12,823 bytes)

14. [TowerTalk] Breaking up guy wires for nonresonance (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 09:59:07 -0400
Some mention has been made of using SWR changes to look for interaction. By the time you see the slightest SWR change, you could have totally "cooked" the antenna's pattern. As ZS6EZ pointed out, it
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00128.html (10,620 bytes)

15. [TowerTalk] Breaking up guy wires for nonresonance (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 10:57:53 EDT
This is a sharp answer with some good humor to a lot of unnecessary nit picking that goes on, on Tower Talk. They never ever contribute any useful info themselves--it's too risky. Any comments. K7GCO
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00349.html (20,762 bytes)

16. [TowerTalk] Breaking up guy wires for nonresonance (score: 1)
Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 11:37:57 -0400
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> As I said before, modeled 'em, measured 'em, done all that, been there. I stand by my post, Ken. You're not the only one with a meter. List Sponsor: Are you thinking a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00353.html (9,168 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu