Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+C\-19XR\s+or\s+Skyhawk\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+C\-19XR\s+or\s+Skyhawk\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] C-19XR or Skyhawk? (score: 1): Author: Neil & Heather <neil.goodell@myfairpoint.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:57:09 -0500; I have been doing a lot of research in the past couple of months for an antenna for the "new" tower, from mono-bander's,to LPDA's,and tri-bander's,with the only criteria being trapless elements...and; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-02/msg00474.html (7,842 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] C-19XR or Skyhawk? (score: 1): Author: "Glen Turner" <w5if@valornet.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:53:12 -0800; Hi Neil, Can tell you that I have had a Skyhawk for about 3 years and absolutely love it. It works very well all across the bands. You can also tune it on 12/17 meters. Have been turning mine with a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-02/msg00478.html (9,287 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] C-19XR or Skyhawk? (score: 1): Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:18:42 -0500; Neil: I have had the Skyhawk up on my tower since 2001. It went together well - I even enjoyed pop riveting all the elements. When I got it on top of the tower the SWR curves were as spec'd - below 2; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-02/msg00482.html (9,216 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]