Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+C\-31XR\s+vs\.\s+4\s+el\.\s+SteppIR\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+C\-31XR\s+vs\.\s+4\s+el\.\s+SteppIR\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] C-31XR vs. 4 el. SteppIR (score: 1): Author: Dan Levin <djl@andlev.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:21:52 -0800 (PST); I did a fairly detailed computer model study of these two antennae, looking at gain in particular. You can read it at http://www.k6if.com/ . My summary was that even with fixed element spacing, the 4; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00420.html (7,145 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] C-31XR vs. 4 el. SteppIR (score: 1): Author: "Bill" <w5vx@hiline.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 18:24:53 -0600; Dan, I'm not trying to pick a fight and I know that I am going to regret asking this question but... How can a 4 element multiband yagi with a compromised boom length deliver gain approximating that; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00428.html (9,009 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] C-31XR vs. 4 el. SteppIR (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 20:02:46 -0500; What boom length is "compromised?" All of the yagi studies show a regular increase in gain with increasing with boom length. As long as there are enough elements to "fill" the boom and the elements; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00433.html (8,354 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] C-31XR vs. 4 el. SteppIR (score: 1): Author: "ChetMoore" <ChetMoore@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 20:06:41 -0500; Remember the operative word here is "modeled" in the models, a bumble can't fly. _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00434.html (10,798 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] C-31XR vs. 4 el. SteppIR (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 20:53:09 -0500; models, a bumble can't Che, That actually is just one of those urban myths. In the model and through calculations, a bumble bee can fly. 73 Tom _______________________________________________ See: h; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00439.html (8,242 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] C-31XR vs. 4 el. SteppIR (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 18:01:22 -0800; But hey.. that's why it's a "discussion list"... from discussion comes understanding and enlightenment. The well designed 5 el monobander is, by definition, a compromise design of some sort.. either; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00441.html (10,201 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] C-31XR vs. 4 el. SteppIR (score: 1): Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 06:57:19 -0600; The original statement is true. It is: If you analyze the Bumble Bee by the rules of classical aerodynamics, you will find that the Bumble Bee cant fly; However, the Bumble Bee does not operate by th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00455.html (9,842 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]