Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+C\-3S\s+and\s+TS850S\s+ant\s+tuner\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+C\-3S\s+and\s+TS850S\s+ant\s+tuner\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] C-3S and TS850S ant tuner (score: 1): Author: aa651@freenet.toronto.on.ca (Rick Pipcans); Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 00:14:49 -0500 (EST); I am considering the purchase the C-3S from Force12. One of my concerns is if the antenna tuner in my TS850S will allow operation on 12 and 17M bands. Does anyone have any experiences with a TS850S/C; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00146.html (8,178 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] C-3S and TS850S ant tuner (score: 1): Author: n7ex@athenet.net (Dave_K9NX); Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 12:52:01 +0000; Rick I am using just such a combination with the following observations The "Good News". Your TS850 will likely tune the C3S just fine on 12 and 17. I say likely because there are certain impedances; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00147.html (10,702 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] C-3S and TS850S ant tuner (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 13:04:14 +0000; In this respect, the C-3 appears to be a much better antenna on 12 and 17, so maybe it's worth the extra 6 feet of boom. 73, Pete Smith N4ZR n4zr@contesting.com Loud is good. -- FAQ on WWW: http://ww; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00148.html (10,421 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] C-3S and TS850S ant tuner (score: 1): Author: DAVED@ctilidar.com (Dave D'Epagnier); Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 08:52:07 -0700; Rick, I've got a C3S and an Icom IC-756. The tuner tunes it in fine on 12 and 17 meters. It even tunes it on 6 meters. I'll bet the TS850 will be able to tune it as well. The C3S performs about like; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00151.html (10,608 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] C-3S and TS850S ant tuner (score: 1): Author: weightdn@bright.net (Mike Rhodes); Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 18:05:54 -0500; I use the C4 and made an interesting observation that may hold true for the C3 also. Seems that I may have read about this on one of the reflectors already but just experienced it for myself while li; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00154.html (8,592 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] C-3S and TS850S ant tuner (score: 1): Author: ronc@sonic.net (Ron Castro); Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 17:21:07 -0800; I found the same thing with my C-4, so it's not my imagination after all! On 17 meters, the most forward gain is off the back of the beam. 12 meters works the right way and I have worked though a fai; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00155.html (9,889 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] C-3S and TS850S ant tuner (score: 1): Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 14:52:29 GMT; On Sat, 9 Jan 1999 17:21:07 -0800, "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net> wrote: I believe this juicy bit of information is on the web page, in the manual, etc. RTFM (Read the friendly manual), folks... 73 &; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00174.html (8,778 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] C-3S and TS850S ant tuner (score: 1): Author: ronc@sonic.net (Ron Castro); Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 18:26:07 -0800; I couldn't find any reference to the C-4's pattern being reversed on 17 meters in the manual (1994 version dwC31.002) or on the web page. Where did you see that information? Ron, N6AHA --Original Mes; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00191.html (10,128 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] C-3S and TS850S ant tuner (score: 1): Author: Guy Olinger, K2AV" <k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 23:07:23 -0500; Well..... Now that I have gone looking, I see the web page is revised. Among other things, the C3SS and C31XR are down with the rest of the C3/4 specs, and all mention of the reverse is gone. I have; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00193.html (11,356 bytes)
10. [TowerTalk] C-3S and TS850S ant tuner (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 18:35:21 -1000; all Aloha, I am a bit sunburned from fooling around assembling my C4 the last two days. Have ducked out of the sun quite a bit, so am not trying to do it all in a day or two. Plan on putting the C4; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00194.html (9,812 bytes)
11. [TowerTalk] C-3S and TS850S ant tuner (score: 1): Author: ronc@sonic.net (Ron Castro); Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 21:50:43 -0800; Well, there it is, in black and white! I guess my old manual was not detailed enough, but I figured it out on my own. The 15 meter reflector acts like a director on 17, but the front-to-back isn't re; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00195.html (10,016 bytes)
12. [TowerTalk] C-3S and TS850S ant tuner (score: 1): Author: spelunk.sueno@cwix.com (spelunk.sueno); Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 00:56:18 -0500; Folks: I'm looking at a paper copy of F12's web page from 15 Feb 98. It introduces the WARC-7 and C-3SS. The latter's specs read, "The directivity on 12 meters is the same as 20-15-10. On 17 mtrs, th; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00197.html (13,132 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]