- 1. [TowerTalk] C3/C3S (score: 1)
- Author: amaertz@oppd.com (MAERTZ, A REID)
- Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1998 09:36:58 -0500
- Greetings: Thanks very much for your replies to my post. This is a summary of the many replies I received comparing the Force 12 C-3 and C-3S to Mosley TA-33. Force 12 wins hands down. Positives incl
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00035.html (13,157 bytes)
- 2. FW: [TowerTalk] C3/C3S (score: 1)
- Author: amaertz@oppd.com (MAERTZ, A REID)
- Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1998 12:05:59 -0500
- Hi Tom took some time to respond to this discussion. I thought it might be of interest to most, so I thought I'd put it out for everyone's review. Reid W0FVR -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00042.html (8,958 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] C3/C3S (score: 1)
- Author: w5robert@blkbox.com (Robert W5AJ)
- Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1998 23:09:44 -0500
- Reading tribander report on C3 and it says 3 elements on 28mhz, however the forward gain seems somewhat lower on that band? Is it really close spaced? What happened? 73 Robert Greetings: Thanks very
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00053.html (13,926 bytes)
- 4. [TowerTalk] C3/C3S (score: 1)
- Author: rthorne@tcac.net (Richard Thorne)
- Date: Sat, 03 Oct 1998 07:47:20 -0500
- The C3 uses two driven elements for bandwidth. Hence 3 elements. To: <towertalk@contesting.com> -- 73, Richard Thorne - N5ZC (ex KA2DSY, N2BHP, WB5M) Amarillo, TX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00055.html (16,608 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu