Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+C3\/C3S\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] C3/C3S (score: 1)
Author: amaertz@oppd.com (MAERTZ, A REID)
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1998 09:36:58 -0500
Greetings: Thanks very much for your replies to my post. This is a summary of the many replies I received comparing the Force 12 C-3 and C-3S to Mosley TA-33. Force 12 wins hands down. Positives incl
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00035.html (13,157 bytes)

2. FW: [TowerTalk] C3/C3S (score: 1)
Author: amaertz@oppd.com (MAERTZ, A REID)
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1998 12:05:59 -0500
Hi Tom took some time to respond to this discussion. I thought it might be of interest to most, so I thought I'd put it out for everyone's review. Reid W0FVR -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00042.html (8,958 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] C3/C3S (score: 1)
Author: w5robert@blkbox.com (Robert W5AJ)
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1998 23:09:44 -0500
Reading tribander report on C3 and it says 3 elements on 28mhz, however the forward gain seems somewhat lower on that band? Is it really close spaced? What happened? 73 Robert Greetings: Thanks very
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00053.html (13,926 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] C3/C3S (score: 1)
Author: rthorne@tcac.net (Richard Thorne)
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 1998 07:47:20 -0500
The C3 uses two driven elements for bandwidth. Hence 3 elements. To: <towertalk@contesting.com> -- 73, Richard Thorne - N5ZC (ex KA2DSY, N2BHP, WB5M) Amarillo, TX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00055.html (16,608 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu