Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+C31XR\s+\/\s+CC\s+402CD\s+Question\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] C31XR / CC 402CD Question (score: 1)
Author: dmcduff@gate.net (Douglas A. McDuff)
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 14:11:02 +0000
Before placing my order for a 31XR, I would like to know (direct email please) of any TT'ers experience who has/is utilizing the above combination. In particular, I am interested in your experience w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00450.html (8,306 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] C31XR / CC 402CD Question (score: 1)
Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 23:05:42 -0400
The interaction mentioned affects ANY 15 meter beam, be it monobander, tribander, 5-bander, Force 12, Cushcraft, whatever brand.. The problem relates to whether or not the 40 meter beam has secondary
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00463.html (10,842 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] C31XR / CC 402CD Question (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 23:26:46 -0600
Guy - I find your specification of 15M interaction to be misleading and presumptious. I can understand how a FULL SIZE 40M element would interact with 15M performance due to harmonic relationships bu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00465.html (12,378 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] C31XR / CC 402CD Question (score: 1)
Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 10:02:08 -0400
You might think a little about it. If it affects one fifteen meter beam in-line, it will affect any because the secondary resonance effect is on the forty meter beam, not the 15 meter beam. Also plea
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00472.html (14,608 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] C31XR / CC 402CD Question (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 09:40:55 -0600
N4KG responses inserted throughout text below. Understand and agree, IF and that is a BIG IF the 40M beam exhibits a 15M resonance. My point is that a LOADED element does NOT necessarily exhibit a re
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00476.html (18,553 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] C31XR / CC 402CD Question (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (Dave Hachadorian)
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 09:04:02 +0000
The 40-2CD works well aligned with a nearby tribander. Mine is only 6 feet above the tribander. The loading coils in the 40-2CD elements move the third harmonic resonance to about 18 Mhz. In fact, th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00482.html (9,201 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] C31XR / CC 402CD Question (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 10:56:38 -0600
N4KG comments inserted below. On Tue, 24 Apr 2001 09:04:02 +0000 Dave Hachadorian <k6ll@juno.com> writes: Do you see 6 lobes on 17M on your 40-2CD when you rotate it? If so, then it is acting as 3/2
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00488.html (9,594 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] C31XR / CC 402CD Question (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 11:32:47 EDT
<< The Force 12 x40N model 40 meter beams have their secondary resonance at 18 MHz due to the design of the linear loading and are spaced with C31's at distances as small as 8 feet, and inline. There
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00516.html (8,944 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] C31XR / CC 402CD Question (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (Dave Hachadorian)
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 09:01:25 +0000
I did a quick experiment yesterday with another ham a few miles away. The 40-2CD has only two broad lobes, broadside to the elements(6dB BW 120 degrees)on 18 Mhz. There is a sharp null, only a few de
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00518.html (8,891 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] C31XR / CC 402CD Question (score: 1)
Author: k3nd@yahoo.com (GALE STEWARD)
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 09:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
Interesting. I did a similar test a few years ago with a station about 20 miles away. My 40-2CD is at 72 ft and showed fairly deep front-to-side but also had about 6 db front-to-back on 18 Mhz in fav
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00519.html (10,006 bytes)

11. [TowerTalk] C31XR / CC 402CD Question (score: 1)
Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 12:47:20 -0400
As part of a continuing thread off-reflector with N4KG, I did some modeling, responding to a question about a 3/2 wave mode antenna and the probability of a six point pattern, as would be obtained us
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00521.html (11,983 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] C31XR / CC 402CD Question (score: 1)
Author: djones449@home.com (David Jones)
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 22:14:10 -0400
Dave, Your posting raised a somewhat related experience I am having right now and I would love your input. I have a tribander/40m dipole (cut 7.060) yagi at about 52ft, along with Inv-V for 80m (cut
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00535.html (11,733 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu