Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+C4S\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+C4S\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] C4S (score: 1): Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca>; Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 07:56:10 -0600; Hi, Does anyone have any real-world thoughts to share on the performance of the C4S at 50'? Particularly in regards to 40m? Also, interesting: C4S at Texas Towers, $629 US ($850 Cdn). C4S at Radiowor; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00495.html (6,753 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] C4S (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:29:27 EST; Hmm, that's the height we used for our tribander comparison report so it would give you some insight. The C3 was one of the antennas we tested - it played very well. (The report is available at <A HR; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00496.html (7,592 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]