Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+CC\&R\'s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+CC\&R\'s\s*$/: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: k1vr@juno.com (Fred Hopengarten); Date: Fri, 02 May 1997 13:14:47 EDT; On Thu, 1 May 1997 02:30:50 +-100 Paul van der Eijk <pvander@erols.com> writes: K1VR replies: Paul has a good point here. If you CAN, you SHOULD apply for the antenna support structure without specif; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-05/msg00046.html (8,099 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: k1vr@juno.com (Fred Hopengarten); Date: Fri, 02 May 1997 17:37:11 EDT; On Thu, 1 May 1997 02:30:50 +-100 Paul van der Eijk <pvander@erols.com> writes: K1VR replies: Paul has a good point here. If you CAN, you SHOULD apply for the antenna support structure without specif; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-05/msg00062.html (8,096 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: kk6t@joneslumber.com (Terry Dunlap); Date: Mon, 21 Apr 1997 18:02:21 -0400 (EDT); I will begin house hunting in a couple of weeks. Can someone give me a checklist of documents that need to be inspected and the easiest way to get access to these documents. Should a lawyer who is ex; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-04/msg00674.html (7,319 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: wa2moe@doitnow.com (wa2moe); Date: Mon, 21 Apr 1997 15:24:50 -0700; -- suggest contacting your arrl area legal volunteer. cc&r's and zoning need checking and you can make your offer contingent upon your freedom to erect the tower and antennas of your choice. this is; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-04/msg00675.html (8,040 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Mon, 21 Apr 1997 21:36:35 -0400 (EDT); What an exciting adventure! Good luck on meeting most of your home criteria - at least the important ones. A bigger issue than the documents is the legal framework that cc&r's, zoning, permits, regul; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-04/msg00678.html (8,003 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: JimW9WU@aol.com (JimW9WU@aol.com); Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 15:36:51 -0400 (EDT); << I will begin house hunting in a couple of weeks. Can someone give me a checklist of documents that need to be inspected and the easiest way to get access to these documents. Should a lawyer who is; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-04/msg00703.html (8,637 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: k1vr@juno.com (Fred Hopengarten); Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 11:37:04 EDT; == Dayton HamVentiontm Legal Forum April 30, 1995 May 26, 1996 Documents You May Need by Fred Hopengarten, J.D., K1VR Copyright 1996 Experience has shown that it is useful collect the following docum; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-04/msg00941.html (13,082 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: JC_Smith@designlink.com (JC_Smith@designlink.com); Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 14:01:32 GMT; Man, whoever wrote this stuff (see below) must be a glutton for punishment. In any case, Terry's original question seemed to be about documents to check BEFORE buying the house, not what he will need; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-04/msg00945.html (16,646 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: "Tom Champlin" <w0hh@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 11:38:01 -0600; There has been a lot posted about antenna restrictions. Here in the Kansas city area it's no different. Wanting to buy a new home, I have been to many, many new housing additions. I recently found an; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00002.html (8,838 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: Colburn <kd4e@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2004 12:50:58 -0500; Tom Champlin wrote: There has been a lot posted about antenna restrictions. Here in the Kansas city area it's no different. Wanting to buy a new home, I have been to many, many new housing additions.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00003.html (9,804 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 11:15:00 -0800; Comments interspersed below many, have Granted, Part 15 says that the manufacturer/operator of the consumer equipment has to deal with it, but in practice, you'd hate to take on all the homeowners in; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00005.html (11,512 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: "Jim Miller" <JimMiller@STL-Online.Net>; Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 23:21:51 -0600; How does the OTARD rule apply or not apply to amateur radio antennas possibly even support "structures"? - http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/News_Releases/2000/nrwl0038.html) - "the FCC extended to; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00013.html (14,485 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: Alan Beagley <AB2OS@att.net>; Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 00:33:44 -0500; We just bought a house in W. Michigan and had to look for quite a while before we found a suitable property. Our first choice turned out to have CC&Rs explicitly banning antennas other than small dis; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00014.html (11,134 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: Alan Beagley <AB2OS@att.net>; Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 00:37:14 -0500; It is my understanding that the FCC's ruling does not apply to CC&Rs and HOAs -- on the grounds that one "voluntarily" agrees to be bound by these restrictions and HOA rules. Alan AB2OS On 01/02/04 1; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00015.html (8,461 bytes)
15. Re: [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 08:22:01 -0800; OTARD specifically excludes amateur radio, broadcast AM/FM, CB and the like.. Broadcast video (terrestrial, local stations only), satellite (DBS, 1m antenna size), and two way internet/video type ser; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00021.html (12,887 bytes)
16. Re: [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 08:24:08 -0800; True only for PRB-1. OTARD specifically applies to HOAs, CC&Rs, etc. Unfortunately OTARD excludes amateur radio, but can be useful to force a rule change. See my other post for a lot more detail. Jim; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00022.html (8,880 bytes)
17. Re: [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: "Tom Champlin" <w0hh@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 10:41:59 -0600; The ARRL web site has a sample letter to send to your Representative in Washington. The also have a finder for these Representatives. I just finished using this to send a letter to mine. This concern; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00025.html (15,447 bytes)
18. Re: [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>; Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2004 14:21:45 -0800; I recently moved from a HOA controlled area. At my old QTH, AFTER I moved in, and AFTER I put up a small tower and beam the HOA added a rules and regs restriction almost identical to what you show as; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00044.html (13,126 bytes)
19. Re: [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: "David L. Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 22:35:07 -0500; Wait a minute. K4BAI and W4UCK (both Judges!!) told us that its illegal to add restrictive rules after the fact except where they (HOA) had let them expire. This may be the case. In either case the l; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00056.html (9,129 bytes)
20. [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 17:26:25 -0000; TT'ers: Covenants and deed restrictions are private contracts. They can say anything they wish. HOWEVER, if they aren't filed with the government as a restriction upon a deed, then the homeowner MAY; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00592.html (8,262 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]