Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+CC\&R\'s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+CC\&R\'s\s*$/: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

21. [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 12:42:14 -0000; TT: As I said...CC&R's are private contracts. They were often written by original developers, who may not have been lawyers. You MUST read the fine print. The exchange below typifies this. -0- (My CC; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00605.html (8,279 bytes)
22. Re: [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: Tom Anderson <WW5L@gte.net>; Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 11:30:26 -0600; Jim, et. al: Years ago my XYL Cheryl (WY5H) and I looked at one development out in the country (one of those type that offer to pay youir gas, give you a 5 piece set of cookware, etc.) and asked to s; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00613.html (10,381 bytes)
23. [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: "Doug Ferguson" <thenewt@msn.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 00:34:49 -0700; I am considering buying a piece of property which would be perfect for my 72 ft. tower and a couple antennas. However when the realtor pulled out the CC&R's, the following line was found : "large sat; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00365.html (7,474 bytes)
24. Re: [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: Ryan Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:26:40 -0400; Any antenna restrictions could pose a problem. The fact that they put TV antennas and satellite dishes sounds like a loophole. I'm sure they intended to exclude any "ugly" antennas. I would look else; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00366.html (8,544 bytes)
25. Re: [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:22:36 -0400; Since the TV antenna prohibition and perhaps even the large satellite dish have been voided by the FCC and you have no HOA the best approach is to get a lawyers opinion and find out what the current; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00376.html (9,456 bytes)
26. [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: "Doug Ferguson" <thenewt@msn.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 13:55:32 -0700; Thanks to all for the responses to my "simple" question. I guess the bottom line is that there is no simple answer. After meeting and talking to a couple prospective neighbors I get the feeling that,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00377.html (7,273 bytes)
27. Re: [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 13:57:05 -0700; I wouldn't go near it. CC&Rs are contractual, and not law, so are not subject to FCC oversight. AND since there's no association, you've got no way to get it changed. You absolutely SHOULD tell the r; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00379.html (8,032 bytes)
28. Re: [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:45:14 EDT; my 72 ft. tower and a couple antennas. However when the realtor pulled out the CC&R's, the following line was found : "large satellite dishes and roof-mounted television antennas are not allowed". wo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00383.html (7,778 bytes)
29. Re: [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: Tom Anderson <andersonww5l@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:53:18 -0700 (PDT); When my XYL (WY5H Cheryl) and I bought our present QTH in 1992 we put into the offer contract to the owner that there was no HOA, no deed restrictions, nothing prohibiting us putting up a tower. We d; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00393.html (9,717 bytes)
30. Re: [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: Tom Anderson <andersonww5l@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:00:23 -0700 (PDT); Doug: In addition to my other msg. When my XYL and I moved to our present QTH we told our neighbors what we were doing and they didn't object. We also have a call list when a Skywarn net is activated; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00394.html (9,202 bytes)
31. Re: [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: Lawrence Melby <lemii@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:26:27 -0700 (PDT); FYI if you can find a copy of Fred's book it's going to be pricey. I couldn't find one locally and what I found on Amazon had it listed at $900 plus He has a second volume that is in the works. Hop; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00405.html (8,024 bytes)
32. Re: [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:05:15 -0500; If you find yourself dealing with informal complaints about a new tower it can help to employ some psychology in your actions. When a new antenna structure first goes up, the negativity about it is a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00428.html (10,912 bytes)
33. Re: [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: Tom Anderson <andersonww5l@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:26:09 -0700 (PDT); When I put up my first tower (40 ft. of Rohn 25) in another neighborhood from where we live now, back in the 1980s, my neighbors thought it was so "nice" that I was erecting a carillon "bell tower" f; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00431.html (10,343 bytes)
34. Re: [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: "Barry Merrill" <barry@mxg.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:37:03 -0500; When I asked about putting up a tower on our costal bluff in Ireland, locals suggested to put up a 30 foot tower for six months, then if no complaints, raise it to 40 feet, then if no complaint, rais; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00435.html (11,833 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 34
Page: [1] [2]