Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+CC\s+XM240\s+above\s+a\s+big\s+Tribander\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] CC XM240 above a big Tribander (score: 1)
Author: "Marsh Stewart" <marsh@ka5m.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 19:15:18 -0500
How close vertically on the same mast can a new CC XM240 be to a big 10/15/20M tribander without serious interaction? Marsh, KA5M _______________________________________________ _____________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-04/msg00341.html (7,285 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] CC XM240 above a big Tribander (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <k6ll.dave@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 18:49:31 -0700
My XM240 is six feet above a KT-34XA. The booms are aligned. It works for me. After you get the antennas installed, run a f/b ratio test on the tribander. Front-to-back ratio is easy to measure, and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-04/msg00345.html (8,844 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] CC XM240 above a big Tribander (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 22:40:20 -0500
Dave I guess that it is all a matter of antennas and situations. I put up a XM240 at about 133 feet above a Force 12 C3E at 120 feet or about 13 feet apart. The interaction between the two was fairly
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-04/msg00350.html (9,955 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] CC XM240 above a big Tribander (score: 1)
Author: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 08:26:42 -0400
Wasn't there something said years ago about grounding the reflector on the XM240 so it would work like the earlier 402CD? I can't remember if this was intended to reduce the interaction on 15M or if
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-04/msg00353.html (11,047 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] CC XM240 above a big Tribander (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 08:55:53 -0600
When I was in Montana, I had an ungrounded XM240 and every time a storm would brew up you could hear the sprarking between the element and the boom in person and obviously on the radio. At night you
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-04/msg00357.html (11,836 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] CC XM240 above a big Tribander (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <k6ll.dave@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 08:00:18 -0700
I have to apologize for my previous posting on this subject that said I had an XM240 6 feet above a KT-34XA. My 40 Meter antenna is the 40-2CD, not the XM240. I got the model numbers mixed up. Sorry
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-04/msg00358.html (13,635 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] CC XM240 above a big Tribander (score: 1)
Author: Wayne Kline <w3ea@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 11:04:45 -0400
Interesting Mike ? I replaced my Hi Gain 3 element with an XM240 and it's insulated elements gave me no top loading for my shunt feed tower ( only boom @ DC ground) Question ..... Di the grounding ha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-04/msg00359.html (10,293 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] CC XM240 above a big Tribander (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 09:14:34 -0600
I don't believe that there was any change to the swr curve or FB. I believe that one of the Cushcraft Engineers said that grounding the Reflector was ok. It might have been by someone who modeled it.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-04/msg00360.html (10,716 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu