Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+CL\-35\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+CL\-35\?\?\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] CL-35??? (score: 1): Author: w5rz@arkansas.net (Dennis Schaefer); Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 23:59:23 -0500; Thanks for all the help with my poorly performing CL-33. I received several good suggestions and considered them all, including more than one that said "get a Bencher or Force 12". I decided I should; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00249.html (10,782 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] CL-35??? (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 05:31:33 -0600; With two towers, I would go with Monobanders. A VERY GOOD 3L20 can be realized on a 24 ft boom (8.5 dBi) and it will work well at 60 ft. The boom can be gamma matched as a rotary dipole on 40M. Do NO; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00252.html (8,510 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] CL-35??? (score: 1): Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com); Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 08:57:48 EDT; In a message dated 10/12/01 4:11:17 AM Pacific Daylight Time, n4kg@juno.com writes:<< Used monobanders can often be purchased at attractive prices. For additional directional and waveangle diversity,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00255.html (7,495 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]