Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+CMC\-230\-5K\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+CMC\-230\-5K\s*$/: 48 ]

Total 48 documents matching your query.

41. [TowerTalk] CMC-230-5K (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 08:40:06 -0700; Your plan is wrong. A choke is most effective at the feedpoint, not some fraction of a wavelength from the feedpoint, as it would be at a switch. &&&& U misunderstood me. The CMC-230-5k will be at th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00355.html (12,922 bytes)
42. Re: [TowerTalk] CMC-230-5K (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 09:44:02 -0700; the top of the tower. For this application, for experimental purposes, I want to be able to quickly move the CMC from one ant to another to another, so it has to cover at least from 160-15m. Your pla; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00356.html (15,257 bytes)
43. Re: [TowerTalk] CMC-230-5K (score: 1): Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 13:34:44 -0400; I find this series of posts to be both interesting and educational. TowerTalk is for discussion of tower and HF antenna construction topics so chokes seem relevant to me. John KK9A Guys, there is an; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00357.html (8,515 bytes)
44. Re: [TowerTalk] CMC-230-5K (score: 1): Author: Chuck Dietz <w5prchuck@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 12:37:28 -0500; It is interesting and timely for me. Chuck W5PR _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00358.html (9,247 bytes)
45. Re: [TowerTalk] CMC-230-5K (score: 1): Author: Mirko S57AD <miroslav.sibilja@amis.net>; Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 20:21:50 +0200; Likewise! _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00359.html (10,064 bytes)
46. Re: [TowerTalk] CMC-230-5K (score: 1): Author: gmuller885--- via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 15:51:42 -0400; K9GEM gmuller885@aol.com I agree with Tod. 73, Bob K6UJ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00360.html (11,565 bytes)
47. Re: [TowerTalk] CMC-230-5K (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 18:53:15 -0400; To me this is appropriate for Tower Talk. We've been talking about common mode chokes on here for a very long time. This particular item simply touts other functions of a choke at the antenna. It's s; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00361.html (9,533 bytes)
48. [TowerTalk] CMC-230-5K (score: 1): Author: Kevin Stover <kevin.stover@mediacombb.net>; Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 10:46:25 -0500; K9YC, What happens when it works? Balun Designs has been making chokes like that for a few years now. No great up swelling of angst and hysteria has ensued and neither has one of said chokes blown a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00363.html (9,333 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 48
Page: [1] [2] [3]