- 1. Re: [TowerTalk] CUSHCRAFT XM-240 bandwidth (score: 1)
- Author: k7lxc--- via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 16:01:32 +0000 (UTC)
- Howdy, TowerTalkians - These comments pertain to the 402CD but I suspect they'll be the same for the XM-240. Split the difference between CW and MID settings and your 2:1 points will be 7.000
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-11/msg00052.html (7,231 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] CUSHCRAFT XM-240 bandwidth (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Sublette <k4to.dave@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 12:12:56 -0500
- FWIW .... I ran a stack of the older Cushcraft 2 element 40M yagis at 70 and 140 feet for more than 25 years. They were great. I have replaced them with a pair of 2 element Moxons at 75 and 145 feet.
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-11/msg00053.html (9,333 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] CUSHCRAFT XM-240 bandwidth (score: 1)
- Author: Tyler Stewart via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 17:42:30 +0000 (UTC)
- Now that you mention it, thats what I did....split between CW and Mid with similar results. Ty K3MM Howdy, TowerTalkians - These comments pertain to the 402CD but I suspect they'll be the same f
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-11/msg00054.html (8,152 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] CUSHCRAFT XM-240 bandwidth (score: 1)
- Author: Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 12:28:03 -0600
- Steve is right on the short stack. I run a set of the JK402T here - which is the Moxon-like thing JK makes - at 70 & 140'. Works pretty good and has nice BW & good F/B compared to what you would exp
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-11/msg00055.html (9,496 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] CUSHCRAFT XM-240 bandwidth (score: 1)
- Author: "Tim Duffy" <k3lr@k3lr.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 00:00:17 -0500
- I had a stack on XM-240 Cushcrafts for one year at 185 feet over 120 feet - replaced with W6NL Moxons at the same height - HUGE improvement. Comparing the Moxon stack to the three high FULL size OWA
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-11/msg00061.html (10,428 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu