Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Cage\s+Dipole\s+Performance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Cage\s+Dipole\s+Performance\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Cage Dipole Performance (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:02:06 -0700; In response to N3OX's posting on cage dipoles, I searched around to find more information on them and happened to find the website of a manufacturer who also claimed better performance than a standar; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00327.html (10,473 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Cage Dipole Performance (score: 1): Author: "Bill Aycock" <billaycock@centurytel.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:05:59 -0500; Thanks to Dave for the quotation, and for the information from the maker. However, it raises more questions. The definition of "Time Diversity" says that it is a means of increasing accuracy by sendi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00332.html (8,310 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Cage Dipole Performance (score: 1): Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:59:47 -0700; Thanks for posting this, David. Having read the email you received from the cage antenna manufacturer, I am still extremely skeptical that this antenna if operated at a frequency where its length is; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00335.html (14,112 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Cage Dipole Performance (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:15:25 -0400; The company's name was on the original post so it's no secret. You can view their website at: http://dxblaster.com . The company will even allow an on-the-air demo of this antenna. Compare the cage d; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00336.html (11,107 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Cage Dipole Performance (score: 1): Author: Patrick <flymooney@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 18:14:47 -0400; One thing I would definitely invest in is a decent spell-checker for company communications. Patrick KA4ZNU _______________________________________________ ___________________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00392.html (7,583 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]