Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Cal\-Av\s+2D\-40\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Cal\-Av\s+2D\-40\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Cal-AV 2D-40 (score: 1): Author: mccarty@hal-pc.org (David & Amy McCarty); Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 04:01:34 -0500; I'm interested in the relatively new driven array design by Cal-AV. Looks like it might hold up in our S Texas winds. Any of you out there other than WX0B with operating experience with this antenna?; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00496.html (6,871 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Cal-Av 2D-40 (score: 1): Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:24:41 -0400; Hi. I'm considering buying a used Cal-Av 2D-40 2-element 40m beam and would like to hear some opinions on performance and installation. I'd like to hear from any owners/users on how the 2D-40 compare; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00484.html (9,060 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Cal-Av 2D-40 (score: 1): Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:13:24 -0700 (PDT); I'm not an owner, but I have done a lot of modeling and building of 2 element driven arrays like this one. The bandwidth and front to back ratio are considerably better than parasitic arrays. There i; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00488.html (8,974 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]