Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Capstan\s+Winch\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Capstan\s+Winch\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Capstan Winch (score: 1): Author: "Denis Coolican" <coolican@telus.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:50:28 -0700; I noted that Capstan winches come up once and a while on TowerTalk. Well I built one that is powered by a 120 volt motor / gear box combination that is rated to lift 500 pounds. The engineering detai; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00306.html (7,159 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Capstan Winch (score: 1): Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:21:56 -0800; Small inexpensive motors often have terrible PF. Mostly because they're not used in applications that are PF sensitive: a large consumer getting charged for reactive power (or low PF) is probably go; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00316.html (9,790 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Capstan Winch (score: 1): Author: "Richard Elizondo" <relizondo@ionoscom.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:09:37 -0600; Very nice little rig. These things are a life saver in the big tower world. I really like the worm gear drive. My cat head is much faster (60-80 FPM) but is planetary driven, which can cause backslid; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00318.html (9,180 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Capstan Winch (score: 1): Author: "Denis Coolican" <coolican@telus.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:23:41 -0700; Jim, tnx for your comments. From the readings I have taken with pf, kva, current and kw the efficiency comes out to around 82 percent which I though was pretty high. I note in my readings and your co; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00331.html (7,831 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]