Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Carolina\s+Windom\s+with\s+IC\-737\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Carolina Windom with IC-737 (score: 1)
Author: "Reid" <areidmaertz@sio.midco.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 11:35:23 -0500
Hi! I'm very interested in the RadioWorks Carolina Windom 80 but not sure if my tuners will handle it. My rig is ICOM IC-737 which I like to run barefoot. I also use the IC-2KL with the AT-500 for hi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00200.html (7,090 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Carolina Windom with IC-737 (score: 1)
Author: "Mike, K6BR" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 16:11:45 -0700
I am not sure that the any auto tuner will tune a Windom, I have Carolina Windom 160 and have SWR's around 8:1 on some frequencies. Mike --Original Message-- Hi! I'm very interested in the RadioWorks
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00202.html (7,376 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Carolina Windom with IC-737 (score: 1)
Author: "Mike, K6BR" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 17:23:46 -0700
I did not say I was happy with it Bill, the SWR on mine runs about 3:1, but never below 2.5:1, even though this is the case the feed line losses are still pretty low even at 2.5:1 with a Windom or so
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00203.html (9,604 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Carolina Windom with IC-737 (score: 1)
Author: "Wes Attaway (N5WA)" <wesattaway@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 20:02:12 -0500
I have a Radio Works Carolina Windom 80, and a Radio Works Super Loop 40 up in the pine trees and I easily tune both of them with my Orion's tuner. I have not noticed any particular tuning problem on
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00204.html (8,401 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Carolina Windom with IC-737 (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 19:40:18 -0700
This is the kind of bad information that just never seems to die. A tuner ... ANY tuner .... simply tries to provide a proper impedance transformation between the antenna (or combination of antenna a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00205.html (10,419 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Carolina Windom with IC-737 (score: 1)
Author: "Mike, K6BR" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 20:13:12 -0700
Dave, you are correct if you read my other comments in the thread you will see that I am in agreement and that the losses are very low even with a high SWR with a Carolina Windom. It is not a Dipole
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00206.html (11,849 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Carolina Windom with IC-737 (score: 1)
Author: "bill rubin" <brubin2010@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 18:29:08 -0500
Guys think about what you are saying SWR 8:1 !! So what does the tuner do? , tune the antenna ? or Presents a match for the radio to operate ? If you tune an antenna and have an SWR of 8:1 how much d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00212.html (9,921 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Carolina Windom with IC-737 (score: 1)
Author: "JE Brown" <W4LC@fuse.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 13:18:24 -0000
I have one and the tuner in the TS850SAT seems to handle it ok. One thing you will want to do with this is to drill a couple drain holes in the bottom of the "line isolator" and "feed balun". Water W
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00216.html (11,931 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Carolina Windom with IC-737 (score: 1)
Author: "W4ZW" <w4zw@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 09:18:52 -0400
Reid, I've used OCF Windom's for years and currently use the CW80 here for 80M with a KW. Mine works well on 80M (center is at 100' ASL with both ends up about 55'ASL) and after a little pruning and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00217.html (9,893 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Carolina Windom with IC-737 (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@pclink.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 08:49:16 -0500
I think ALL of the energy radiates, less the coax and tuner IR losses. If the RF doesn't radiate, tell me where the energy goes. 73 de Bob - K&Oslash;RC in MN --Original thread-- Message: 7 Date: Wed
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00218.html (8,871 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Carolina Windom with IC-737 (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 07:21:49 -0700
Heat! Jim _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00219.html (8,391 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Carolina Windom with IC-737 (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Smidt" <xveoneov@primus.ca>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:50:34 -0300
I have had a Carolina Windom '80' for years, now using it as a back up to my 3 EL SteppIR, and the 'AT Tune' button on my TS-870 handles it on ALL HF bands with no problems at all, a really good ante
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00221.html (13,572 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Carolina Windom with IC-737 (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 08:54:12 -0700
and then it just radiates at a somewhat higher frequency _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00222.html (8,411 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Carolina Windom with IC-737 (score: 1)
Author: "GARY JOHNSON" <garywy0v@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:36:36 -0500
C'mon guys . . . How many SRWs can you have???? The answer is ONE!! There is one . . and only one Standing Wave Ratio. Gary - WY0V -- Original Message -- From: bill rubin<mailto:brubin2010@gmail.com>
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00225.html (12,404 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Carolina Windom with IC-737 (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Smidt" <xveoneov@primus.ca>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 13:51:06 -0300
Well..................., one might be a little more specific and indicate which SWR one is talking about. No doubt VSWR :). 73, Carl VE9OV _______________________________________________ ____________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00227.html (14,266 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] Carolina Windom with IC-737 (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 10:24:02 -0700
Well, he did say "less the coax and tuner IR losses", and I assume he was including coax dielectric losses in that qualifier. Other than whatever minor IR losses there may be in the antenna itself,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00230.html (8,504 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] Carolina Windom with IC-737 (score: 1)
Author: Chuck <wcmoore@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 14:59:14 -0500 (CDT)
Actually if you run the numbers using the equation from the ARRL antenna handbook you will find that using open wire feeders your efficiency will be pretty damn good at HF. If it was not for the fact
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00236.html (13,331 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu