Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Challenging\s+Grounding\/Bonding\s+Situation\s+\?\s*$/: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Challenging Grounding/Bonding Situation ? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 18:29:43 -0700
On Fri,9/12/2014 6:00 PM, Bill Turner wrote: Imagine something like a washing machine where the neutral is connected to the frame and down the line the neutral opens up. Now the frame has the full "h
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00134.html (11,158 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] Challenging Grounding/Bonding Situation ? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 18:31:04 -0700
Within a premises. I'm wired as two premises. 73, Jim _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com h
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00135.html (9,683 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] Challenging Grounding/Bonding Situation ? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 18:46:55 -0700
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: That's not what you said in an earlier post. Here's a quote from you: " I have a single service, which comes to the house, then is fed to the garage/apar
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00136.html (10,731 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] Challenging Grounding/Bonding Situation ? (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@largeriver.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 20:50:09 -0500
Jim, Very important as to not mislead someone on this. If you have only a 3 wire feed system from your house to garage then you have to have that feed neutral wire bonded to the panel at both the ho
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00139.html (12,107 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] Challenging Grounding/Bonding Situation ? (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 21:55:04 -0400
Aren't there are a number of old commercial rigs that violate this in the PS. I think our old kitchen range violated it as well, as IIRC I had to change the wiring when we put in a new cook top. 73 R
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00140.html (11,553 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] Challenging Grounding/Bonding Situation ? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 19:06:38 -0700
On Fri,9/12/2014 6:50 PM, Gary Schafer wrote: If you have only a 3 wire feed system from your house to garage then you have to have that feed neutral wire bonded to the panel at both the house and at
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00141.html (11,328 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] Challenging Grounding/Bonding Situation ? (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@largeriver.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 21:05:19 -0500
Ranges and dryers of yesteryear had only 3 wires, 2 hot and neutral/ground. They had to be on a dedicated circuit so as to not energize some other appliance on the same feed if there was an open neut
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00142.html (13,653 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] Challenging Grounding/Bonding Situation ? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 19:09:33 -0700
Yep. As noted, I went through both buildings making sure that was not happening. AND I found and fixed one such wiring error -- some idiot took a 240V feed and used one side to feed 120V outlets with
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00143.html (10,726 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] Challenging Grounding/Bonding Situation ? (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 22:23:04 -0400
My point was that if he had some of the "Old" equipment in the shack wouldn't it be dangerous. 73 Roger (K8RI) Ranges and dryers of yesteryear had only 3 wires, 2 hot and neutral/ground. They had to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00144.html (14,130 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] Challenging Grounding/Bonding Situation ? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 19:55:46 -0700
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: You have to be more descriptive when you say "3 wire feed". There are two kinds of 3 wire feed which are both legal: 1. 120 VAC with hot, neutral and gro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00145.html (10,678 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] Challenging Grounding/Bonding Situation ? (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@largeriver.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 22:11:03 -0500
Yes Jim I believe that you said that in your first post. But in subsequent post you seemed to argue that there was no ground running between buildings and made it sound as though the neutral was not
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00147.html (12,757 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] Challenging Grounding/Bonding Situation ? (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@largeriver.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 22:16:37 -0500
Hi Roger, Yes I agree it would be dangerous. But probably no more so with either feed system with proper neutral bonding. 73 Gary _______________________________________________ _____________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00148.html (16,157 bytes)

33. [TowerTalk] Challenging Grounding/Bonding Situation ? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 23:10:39 -0700
How many times must I say it? Neutral MUST BE bonded in both buildings if ground is not carried. They are treated as separate premises. 73, Jim K9YC wrong. You require 4 conductors. The neutral is NO
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00149.html (11,646 bytes)

34. Re: [TowerTalk] Challenging Grounding/Bonding Situation ? (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 12:56:07 -0400
Even with everything disconnected, lightning is induced into unconnected wires and can cause damage inside your home. John KK9A When lightning is around, I disconnect all coax and rotator cables and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00150.html (8,947 bytes)

35. Re: [TowerTalk] Challenging Grounding/Bonding Situation ? (score: 1)
Author: N3AE <n3ae@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 15:46:11 +0000 (UTC)
Unfortunately this thread has gotten way off the question I originally posted. Perhaps I should have posted a more pragmatic question: If I sustain lightning damage, what grounding and bonding config
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00164.html (8,652 bytes)

36. Re: [TowerTalk] Challenging Grounding/Bonding Situation ? (score: 1)
Author: Paul Christensen <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 11:58:44 -0400
Shawn. That will be determined by the terms and conditions of the policy (e.g., code grandfathering) along with input from the adjuster who inspects the damage. However, If you comply with current NE
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00165.html (9,896 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu