Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Change\s+in\s+Frequency\s+As\s+Antenna\s+Height\s+Rises\s+Above\s+Ground\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Change\s+in\s+Frequency\s+As\s+Antenna\s+Height\s+Rises\s+Above\s+Ground\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Change in Frequency As Antenna Height Rises Above Ground (score: 1): Author: "Don W7WLL" <w7wll@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 14:29:58 -0700; Some feel it could vary either way depending on conditions, but generally . . . . I don't have EZNEC nor have I ever done any programmed antenna modeling. At this point in my 60 years of hamming and; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-05/msg00575.html (13,501 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in Frequency As Antenna Height Rises Above Ground (score: 1): Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>; Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 12:44:53 -0400; there's no "probably" to it! It is lowest (in frequency) closet to the ground. I have now range tested 2 15 meter 6 elements and 2 20 meter 5 elements as well as tested a 40 meter dipole and 4 elemen; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-05/msg00578.html (11,609 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in Frequency As Antenna Height Rises Above Ground (score: 1): Author: Dan Maguire via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 03:42:47 +0000 (UTC); For a 40m dipole model (length 66 ft, diameter 1 inch, aluminum, 29 segments, over "Average" ground) the chart below shows (red trace) the frequency of minimum SWR(50) and (blue trace) the frequency; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-05/msg00583.html (8,507 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]