Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Change\s+in\s+Frequency\s+with\s+Height\s+above\s+Ground\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Change in Frequency with Height above Ground (score: 1)
Author: "Don W7WLL" <w7wll@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 20:24:41 -0700
Brain dead. Manuals all in storage. Lowering the height of an antenna above ground, such as a beam, will cause the resonant freq to decrease, increase? Don W7WLL _____________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-05/msg00546.html (7,561 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in Frequency with Height above Ground (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 20:37:09 -0700
Decrease. But not always -- I have a 10M beam at about 15 ft that goes up! The variable here is mutual coupling between elements and between elements and ground. Another error in using SWR as the ind
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-05/msg00547.html (8,906 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in Frequency with Height above Ground (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 20:53:05 -0700
That's interesting Jim. I remember looking at a graph of the impedance change of a dipole at various heights. It doesn't like being very close to the ground, hihi. Don, FWIW, With my 2 el 40 meter be
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-05/msg00549.html (9,517 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in Frequency with Height above Ground (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 07:45:33 -0400
Tuning an antenna close to the ground is a waste of time. You cannot predict what the SWR will be at your final height. John KK9A That's interesting Jim. I remember looking at a graph of the impedanc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-05/msg00550.html (7,899 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in Frequency with Height above Ground (score: 1)
Author: Dan Maguire via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 14:24:15 +0000 (UTC)
The "Resonate" button of the AutoEZ program makes short work of questions like this. For example, create a 20m dipole model with an arbitrary length of 33.5 ft at height "H" above ground. Set up a se
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-05/msg00555.html (9,234 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Change in Frequency with Height above Ground (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 08:05:15 -0700
Decrease. But not always -- I have a 10M beam at about 15 ft that goes up! The variable here is mutual coupling between elements and between elements and ground. Another error in using SWR as the ind
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-05/msg00556.html (10,530 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in Frequency with Height above Ground (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 08:40:28 -0700
Decrease. But not always -- I have a 10M beam at about 15 ft that goes up! The variable here is mutual coupling between elements and between elements and ground. Another error in using SWR as the ind
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-05/msg00557.html (10,397 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] Change in Frequency with Height above Ground (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 14:25:26 -0700
Resonance is where the reactive component of the feedpoint Z is zero. Lowest SWR could be at some point where the the impedance happens to work out closest. @@ Thats what I thought. Resonance = zero
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-05/msg00563.html (11,962 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in Frequency with Height above Ground (score: 1)
Author: Richard Solomon <dickw1ksz@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 14:58:51 -0700
What ever happened to the old method of standing it up vertical with the reflector closest to the ground ? Is that method out of favor now ?? 73, Dick, W1KSZ _________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-05/msg00564.html (13,355 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in Frequency with Height above Ground (score: 1)
Author: "Hardy Landskov" <n7rt@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 20:08:45 -0400
Dick, I converted a 7 el 6mtr beam to a G0KSC LFA, reflector on a 13 ft flberglass ladder and tuned the DE. Worked very well. His loop fed arrays are so simple and easy to adjust I will not go back t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-05/msg00565.html (14,391 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in Frequency with Height above Ground (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 21:09:16 -0400
Yes the balun leads are part of the antenna. I have not ever modeled them and I typically have to shorten the DE a little. Is there an easy way to model these, it is such a short segment and the lead
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-05/msg00566.html (9,146 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in Frequency with Height above Ground (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF--- via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 22:31:04 -0400
John, you could consider the two balun wires to be a balanced transmission line and model the effect of that. For example, if the wire spacing was 4 inches and the diameter was .1in the impedance wou
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-05/msg00568.html (10,113 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in Frequency with Height above Ground (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 10:39:50 +0100
If you derive the expression for SWR in terms of antenna R and X you can differentiate with respect to frequency and determine the conditions for minimum SWR analytically. You'll find that when dX/df
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-05/msg00571.html (9,774 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu