Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+City\s+attempts\s+to\s+shut\s+down\s+ham\s+radio\s+\.\.\.\.\s+\!\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+City\s+attempts\s+to\s+shut\s+down\s+ham\s+radio\s+\.\.\.\.\s+\!\!\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] City attempts to shut down ham radio .... !! (score: 1): Author: "D.G." <indianaj0nes@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:57:48 -0700 (PDT); City attempts to shut down ham radio .... !! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_d5B9UPw_10 _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk maili; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00113.html (7,356 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] City attempts to shut down ham radio .... !! (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:33:22 -0400; This guy again? He must think we've forgotten the last round. 73, Pete N4ZR _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list Towe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00114.html (8,108 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] City attempts to shut down ham radio .... !! (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 02:19:04 -0400; I really wish people would not post videos like that. Just going on U-tube hurts the credibility of a cause. I watched about 15 to 20 seconds worth and turned it off. 73 Roger (K8RI) ________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00118.html (8,227 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] City attempts to shut down ham radio .... !! (score: 1): Author: Adam Shirley WJ4X <wj4x@amsat.org>; Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:41:36 -0400; I agree 100%. Nothing but drivel. The proper response would be to go to the meeting and get yourself on the docket. Remind them that they have already lost one lawsuit costing the taxpayers of an alr; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00122.html (8,097 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] City attempts to shut down ham radio .... !! (score: 1): Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>; Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:52:30 -0800; Didn't I see those 2 in a porn flick.... :-) MAL N7MAL BULLHEAD CITY, AZ http://www.n7mal.com Everyone in the world is entitled to be burdened by my opinion This guy again? He must think we've forgot; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00124.html (9,253 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] City attempts to shut down ham radio .... !! (score: 1): Author: <kq6i@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:17:34 -0600; Titled "Antenna Envy". rgrds Craig kq6i Peace, long-life, and gud DX! Didn't I see those 2 in a porn flick.... :-) MAL N7MAL BULLHEAD CITY, AZ http://www.n7mal.com Everyone in the world is entitled t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00127.html (8,692 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] City attempts to shut down ham radio .... !! (score: 1): Author: "Dave LaBat" <labatd@ca.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:40:10 -0700; Ok, their presentation is a little "different" but perhaps the esteemed members of this list would like to read the city of Palmdale's proposal that is going before the city council tonight. The reco; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00134.html (11,432 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] City attempts to shut down ham radio .... !! (score: 1): Author: "Jim Miller KG0KP" <JimMiller@STL-OnLine.Net>; Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 15:56:59 -0500; This kind of stuff needs to (also?) be on the Ham-Law reflector - The Ham-Law Mailing List. This list is for discussion and does not purport to give legal advice. Submissions: ham-law@mail.altlaw.com; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00136.html (13,653 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] City attempts to shut down ham radio .... !! (score: 1): Author: chas <chasm@texas.net>; Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 16:05:58 -0500; wonder what the ARRL is doing about this?? better be something or they are going to lose some more members... fwiw chas, k5dam _______________________________________________ ________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00137.html (9,058 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] City attempts to shut down ham radio .... !! (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 17:51:43 -0400; I wish I knew why he copied me with this post. I have no interest in his videos. This guy again? He must think we've forgotten the last round. 73, Pete N4ZR City attempts to shut down ham radio ....; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00139.html (9,087 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] City attempts to shut down ham radio .... !! (score: 1): Author: "Ed McGrath" <w5iok@windstream.net>; Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 18:38:38 -0500; I don't think the Ham-Law Mailing list exists anymore. I have tried to join and get a message, No such mailing list: @mail.altlaw.com _______________________________________________ _________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00142.html (15,549 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] City attempts to shut down ham radio .... !! (score: 1): Author: Kelly Johnson <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 16:50:10 -0700; It does exist, but you're not likely to get the answer you want there anyway. I'm reasonably certain they will tell you that the city of Palmdale is overstepping their bounds and the only recourse is; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00143.html (16,836 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] City attempts to shut down ham radio .... !! (score: 1): Author: Alan NV8A <nv8a@att.net>; Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:13:42 -0400; I just sent a test message to Ham-Law, and this is what I received: " Somebody said that this list is no more. Testing the accuracy of that report. Alan NV8A _________________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00145.html (9,396 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] City attempts to shut down ham radio .... !! (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:05:24 -0700; It's very much alive as of a week or two ago. Join via ARRL website. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing lis; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00147.html (8,967 bytes)
15. Re: [TowerTalk] City attempts to shut down ham radio .... !! (score: 1): Author: Larry Melby <ka5txl@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:28:01 -0700 (PDT); I was to sign up on it yesterday. I guess when I read the instructions for signing up it worked. 73 Larry KA5TXL It's very much alive as of a week or two ago. Join via ARRL website. 73, Jim K9YC ____; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00151.html (9,582 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]