Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Climbing\s+is\s+risky\s+business\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Climbing is risky business (score: 1)
Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 17:57:42 EST
I wanted to pass this info along since although most of us do it only as part of our hobby, we do climb. Be careful up there! The most recent data from the National Institute of Occupational Safety s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00513.html (7,705 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Climbing is risky business (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <mark@concertart.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 17:18:24 -0600
Whoa. 1 in 217. Almost one half of one percent. So if there are 600 of us reading this reflector that would be *3*. Yikes. Thanks Bill. Mark, N5OT part Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Fr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00514.html (8,533 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Climbing is risky business (score: 1)
Author: "Tower (K8RI)" <tower@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 19:27:28 -0500
Being one who still does his own climbing even at my age (Joyce made me quit climbing for the young guys though) I think I can say with some knowledge that when you figure the average employee works
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00515.html (14,475 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Climbing is risky business (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:27:59 -0800
_________________________________________________________ Hold on there, pardner. That's for PROFESSIONAL tower workers, employed full time. How many of us 600 climb our towers eight hours a day? Goe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00516.html (7,917 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Climbing is risky business (score: 1)
Author: "AA6DX" <aa6dx@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:55:41 -0800
Ahh .. but what I was alluding to .. There are, most likely, a bunch of these 6&Oslash;&Oslash; that climb, at times, for $$$$ -- I did, for years. Now .. was I counted, or not, in the "statistics".
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00517.html (9,258 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Climbing is risky business (score: 1)
Author: dan bookwalter <n8dcj@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 08:19:42 -0800 (PST)
a similar situation happened in this general area many years ago... i wont mention the calls of the hams involved... one night ham1 got a call from ham2 asking if he could come over before a contest
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00518.html (18,784 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Climbing is risky business (score: 1)
Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 10:30:44 -0600
There are three kinds of hams. 1) Those that don't climb. 2) Those that climb but can't do any real work on a tower. 3) Tower Monkeys Figure out your category and stay in it. Don't risk yourself or o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00519.html (8,643 bytes)

8. RE: [TowerTalk] Climbing is risky business (score: 1)
Author: "Noel" <y.yaesurigs@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 11:43:43 -0500
Reminds me of an incident in basic training many years ago. My first job in the Air Force was as an antenna maintenance repairman (huah!), and many of our antennas were installed on wooden telephone
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00520.html (10,848 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Climbing is risky business (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 18:00:53 +0000
And if I may also add couple of other categories. There are those hams who : 4. Do it the right way, in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations, and those who do not. How many installations ha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00522.html (10,920 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Climbing is risky business (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@adelphia.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 13:54:48 -0500
When I got out of the Army in 1962, I took a job with a Motorola service station owned by Herb, W1DEO. One of my first tower jobs was to help take down a 40 footer on top of a flat roofed, two storey
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00523.html (10,121 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Climbing is risky business (score: 1)
Author: WD0M <wd0m@centurytel.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 12:32:48 -0700
Since we're telling tales, during the summer after my high school graduation, I worked for the California Institute of Technology's Owens Valley Radio Observatory. One of my duties was to attend to t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00524.html (10,634 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Climbing is risky business (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 18:35:31 -0800
When I climbed my first tower in 1993, about half way up I realized this was going to be my last day on earth. Didn't know exactly how I was going to die; falling off, tower collapses, tower falls ov
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00527.html (8,782 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Climbing is risky business (score: 1)
Author: WK6F <wk6f@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 20:54:27 -0800
All these first tower climb stories are great. I don't have a first tower story, but I was working for a local ham putting up towers and antennas when I was in high school One of the work counselors
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00528.html (9,415 bytes)

14. [TowerTalk] climbing is risky business (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2004 05:10:46 +0000
I know for sure I'm in category 1, and I'm glad I know that. Much better than being in category 1 and thinking and acting like I'm in no. 3. Thank God for wire antennas on poles and verticals. A frie
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00000.html (7,161 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Climbing is risky business (score: 1)
Author: GALE STEWARD <k3nd@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 07:32:24 -0800 (PST)
I remember my first climb. In 1970 I installed my first tower (50ft of R25). Some if my fellow FRC members helped with the installation as this tower business was all new to me. The R25 had the hinge
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00003.html (8,224 bytes)

16. RE: [TowerTalk] Climbing is risky business (score: 1)
Author: "Dale Martin" <kg5u@hal-pc.org>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 23:15:47 -0600
Glad you're still here. Everytime I climb, it's the first time. I work very hard to be frightened about what it is that I'm doing: elevating my body high enough above ground to kill me. The last thi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00017.html (7,781 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] Climbing is risky business (score: 1)
Author: "Tower (K8RI)" <tower@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 01:20:17 -0500
<snip> way. There Amen to that! Being a pilot which is a rehlm as unforgiving as climbing towers I think a lot of the habits and preperation carry over. I seldom climb much over a 100 to 150 feet any
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00018.html (8,968 bytes)

18. [TowerTalk] climbing is risky business (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Gilmer - N2MG" <n2mg@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 05:59:10 -0800 (PST)
You can find that photo in several places on the web... I'll bet this is it: http://carcino.gen.nz/images/index.php/53a722f2/6c779727 Actually, there needs to be three guys up there - one to take the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00021.html (8,508 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] Climbing is risky business (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 14:31:40 +0000
TT: BOTTOM LINE: On a tower, as in driving a car, there are no such things as an accidents. Let's be careful out there! 73 de Gene Smar AD3F _______________________________________________ See: http:
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00023.html (10,457 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] climbing is risky business (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 09:27:47 -0500
At 05:59 AM 2/2/04 -0800, N2MG wrote: You can find that photo in several places on the web... I'll bet this is it: http://carcino.gen.nz/images/index.php/53a722f2/6c779727 Actually, there needs to be
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00024.html (9,207 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu