- 1. Re: [TowerTalk] Close stacking mono bander (score: 1)
- Author: K7LXC--- via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 17:57:54 -0400
- tripod. i was thinking of a small tribander or a hex beam. The son of a W6 ham with a Hexbeam on his roof, when queried what it was by a neighbor - his son responded that it was "air art". Nuff said
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00364.html (6,999 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] Close stacking mono bander (score: 1)
- Author: "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 19:22:58 -0400
- I remember Lew McCoy writing an article in QST 40 years ago saying that you could stack 10,15, and 20 meter beams about 3 feet apart. Then this was debunked a few years later. Even Lew acknowledged t
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00365.html (7,365 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] Close stacking mono bander (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 19:37:37 -0500
- You can stack them, but the interaction defeats the purpose of having monobanders. I just ran through a modeling cycle with my stack and the 15m especially gets whacked. The hex beam or a single trib
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00366.html (9,013 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] Close stacking mono bander (score: 1)
- Author: Patrick Greenlee <patrick_g@windstream.net>
- Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 19:45:47 -0500
- My hex hex beam, 6 band hex beam, hence hex hex, weighs 25 lbs and is nearly symmetrical with respect to torque due to imbalanced windage. A decently heavy duty TV rotor will git 'er done. If you liv
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00367.html (8,454 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] Close stacking mono bander (score: 1)
- Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 21:32:54 -0400
- Look into one of the "multi-monoband" antennas like the Force 12 (www.force12inc.com) XR5-T or XR5-TC - two elements per band (20-10) on a 12 foot boom. See: http://www.force12inc.com/content/XR%20Se
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00368.html (9,551 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu