Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Co\-ax\,\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Co\-ax\,\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Co-ax, (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 21:36:37 -0400; Hi Kelly, As long as we are beating up on things like cables: or had excess brand-name RG-213 for conductor not prone to extent of 9913 and about pigtails. I agree with you on the selection. But I've; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00586.html (8,966 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Co-ax, (score: 1): Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:04:21 -0500; At 09:36 PM 4/28/2004 -0400, you wrote: SNIP I agree with you on the selection. But I've never in my life seen a cable wick up water in the dielectric. I've never had a center conductor migrate eithe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00599.html (7,923 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Co-ax, (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 04:58:21 -0400; above? Isn't this Yes, it is that horrid hollow 9913 and similar cables. I guess Kelly and I were thinking of the same cable. 73 Tom _______________________________________________ See: http://www.m; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00608.html (7,804 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]