Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Coax\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Coax\s*$/: 153 ]

Total 153 documents matching your query.

101. [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@inbox.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 17:04:35 -0700; Jim, this is also from your white paper. Cables such as RG-223, RG-141 and RG-400. All double shielded and the size of RG-58. Q: I have a high power, multi-transmitter station. Can I use RG58 or RG8X; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-07/msg00303.html (7,292 bytes)
102. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 21:04:38 -0700; It's a matter of the shield resistance, as well as the density and the uniformity of the shield. First, as I noted early on, RG-numbers have been next to meaningless for nearly 50 years. We have to s; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-07/msg00313.html (8,315 bytes)
103. [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: Bob Ad5vj <ad5vj@ad5vj.com>; Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 12:46:53 -0500; I bought off Ebay 100' of '400' 50ohm coax. Thinking it was LMR-400. This has got to be the stiffiest, lightest weight, cheapest connector, crap i have laid my hands on. Where can i buy REAL LMR400; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00104.html (6,497 bytes)
104. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 13:17:06 -0700; There's nothing magic about LMR400 that justifies its cost for operation on the HF bands. For use below 100 MHz, Davis 213 is as good, of good quality, and a lot less expensive. For more about coax,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00105.html (7,839 bytes)
105. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 16:39:15 -0400; Texas towers, Davis, The Wireman, Amateur Electronic Supply (AES), HRO, The RF Connection, and many others. Prices do vary. NOTE The Wireman sells their own equivalents, but I've heard no complaints.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00106.html (9,498 bytes)
106. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 16:46:18 -0400; I've not seen any magic about it's price either. It's pretty much right in there with the Belden cables. Compared to the early days of 9913 it's really cheap..er inexpensive at about half the price 9; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00107.html (8,563 bytes)
107. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: "Jim W7RY" <jimw7ry@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 14:32:38 -0700; As I remember, LMR-400 is pretty light! With a foil shield and little braid, and it's copper clad aluminum center, and the highly porous foam, it is pretty light. And you are correct! It's not very f; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00108.html (8,785 bytes)
108. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: Hector Garcia XE2K <j_hector_garcia@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 14:55:10 -0700 (PDT); Bob Maybe you bought the Jefa Tech cable, my experience with that cable is good, since several years ago. at 59 dlls per 100 ft , is one of the cheapest on Ebay For me still working, in 10 years will; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00109.html (8,156 bytes)
109. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>; Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 19:13:13 -0400; I've used thousands of feet of the 400 knockoffs (including the Shireen version at c. .35/ft) as well as Times LMR400, and they are all virtually identical, and that includes sweep tests through 2 GH; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00111.html (8,166 bytes)
110. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 19:37:35 -0400 (EDT); I picked up a roll of Jefa-Tek a few months ago...about half the price of Times LMR 400. All 1000 ft look pretty much the same as the Times stuff. I used some for phasing lines and they test out for; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00112.html (7,188 bytes)
111. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: "Mike" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 17:42:35 -0700; I buy it from RF Parts in SoCal. The real stuff. -Mike, K6BR crap i have laid my hands on. I've used thousands of feet of the 400 knockoffs (including the Shireen version at c. .35/ft) as well as Tim; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00114.html (9,049 bytes)
112. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: Hector Garcia XE2K <j_hector_garcia@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 19:41:09 -0700 (PDT); Like Steve mention, I have LMR and similar in rotor loop and you need to take care to make BIG loops , but if you can for Loops use Bury Flex as first option, after that DXE now have a similar produc; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00115.html (9,554 bytes)
113. [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 21:01:22 -0700; There's nothing magic about LMR400 that justifies its cost for operation on the HF bands. For use below 100 MHz, Davis 213 is as good, of good quality, and a lot less expensive. For more about coax,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00116.html (11,462 bytes)
114. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 21:11:58 -0700; RG213 is not a spec, it's a very broad generic description. There are RG213s built with thin copper braid and others with heavy copper braid. The loss in cable is a direct function of how much copper; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00117.html (9,019 bytes)
115. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 00:12:25 -0400; To get from either station to the top of the tower here is 228 feet. I switched to LMR-600 at $1.29 a foot. I have a bunch of LMR400 and 600UF that I've found does not hold up well when out in the el; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00118.html (13,340 bytes)
116. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: Charlie Gallo <Charlie@TheGallos.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 00:35:18 -0400; ...snip... You end up with 3 x choices. (a) increase the ...snip... Actually, that only makes up the transmit side - that S3 signal just above the noise goes down 3 dB too. I think fighting for the R; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00119.html (8,287 bytes)
117. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 22:59:24 -0700; I'm certainly not advocating against coax that is truly lower loss -- the runs to all of my Al antennas are either hard line or heliax, and I'm using low loss RG11 to feed high wire dipoles for 80 an; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00120.html (9,514 bytes)
118. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 23:49:22 -0700; ...snip... You end up with 3 x choices. (a) increase the ...snip... Actually, that only makes up the transmit side - that S3 signal just above the noise goes down 3 dB too. I think fighting for the R; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00121.html (9,525 bytes)
119. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: TexasRF@aol.com; Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 08:00:10 -0400 (EDT); Hi y'all, the receive side of the coax loss is not nearly as bad as the transmit side. This is because of all the back ground noise on the HF bands. The noise from the heavens alone is on the order o; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00123.html (9,304 bytes)
120. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: "Gene Fuller" <w2lu@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 08:48:59 -0400; Remember, on the receive side the desired signal may go down 3db but the noise also goes down 3db. That's why you can get away with inefficient Rx antennas like beverages, pennants, EWE's, K9AY's, et; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00124.html (9,608 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 120
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]