Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Coax\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Coax\s*$/: 153 ]

Total 153 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.s.ewing@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:32:02 -0400; http://workmanship.nasa.gov/wppr_wc_rfcc.jsp : "Bend Radii for Completed Interconnecting Cable or Harness Individual coaxial cable, Optimum Bend Radius (10x OD), Minimum Bend Radius (6x OD)" So, avoi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00607.html (9,178 bytes)
82. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 06:15:22 -0700; And I suspect that this standard doesn't apply to Heliax and similar styles. There would almost always be a requirement that one follow the manufacturer's recommendation, as well. Jim _______________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00609.html (8,215 bytes)
83. [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: Martin Staffa <geitaemort@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:06:23 -0700 (PDT); LMR 400 at the least for a 500ft. run Times wire has a graph you can use for their products N connectors for sure. _______________________________________________ _________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00368.html (7,117 bytes)
84. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:46:07 -0700; WHY? Please justify your response with measured data, not folklore. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00371.html (7,327 bytes)
85. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:26:12 -0400; If not on UHF I don't see any reason for N connectors. UHF connectors on HF have so little loss you'd never know they are there. I have as many as 14 in each run from the rig to the antennas on top o; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00376.html (8,115 bytes)
86. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: "Gene Fuller" <w2lu@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:56:43 -0400; Just remember that if you use 259's be sure to seal them up good against water intrusion. Gene / W2LU _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ T; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00382.html (8,897 bytes)
87. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: TexasRF@aol.com; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:15:08 EDT; Actually any type connector needs the water intrusion protection. Some types are inherently more resistant to water intrusion but none are totally water proof. I have the green and corroded parts fro; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00384.html (10,747 bytes)
88. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:18:11 -0700; there. Yup. I recently made up 1100 ft of very low loss RG8 in 100 ft lengths for the Iraq DXpedition. I measured their loss in series up to 500 MHz. That's 22 PL259s and 10 barrels. All real Ampheno; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00386.html (9,070 bytes)
89. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: Ryan Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:19:03 -0400; I use N on my heliax runs but that is only because they were actually cheaper than PL259 connectors for the heliax. No other reason. I would have used DIN connectors if they were practical because th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00389.html (9,525 bytes)
90. [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: Martin Staffa <geitaemort@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:23:43 -0700 (PDT); I do not believe what I had read as folklore just fact but you know we could go on for days about this and there is no sign of it ending.So to the gentlemen who know all. 73s _______________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00390.html (7,761 bytes)
91. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:02:35 -0400; I too agree that PL type connectors are fine at HF. Speaking of junk connectors; I used the MFJ 259B to try and measure a new dummy load up thru 2 meters. A PL to N adaptor was used at the MFJ as the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00393.html (11,274 bytes)
92. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:34:33 -0400; 73 Roger (K8RI) _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/lis; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00396.html (10,459 bytes)
93. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: "Jim McLaughlin" <dearborn9@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:03:10 -0500; Well said Martin. I believe your right, you'll never win the argument nor discussion. Jim- WA9FPT I do not believe what I had read as folklore just fact but you know we could go on for days about thi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00397.html (9,018 bytes)
94. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 21:11:52 -0400; So you would ignore what those in the business say and what some of us have measured. That the insertion loss at HF is so small as to be less than a measurement error for the equipment to which most; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00398.html (9,270 bytes)
95. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:53:43 -0700; Yes. I fell into the same trap, buying a lot of that cheap junk at hamfests. On at least six different occasions one after another of them drove me nuts -- everything from intermittents to overheatin; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00408.html (8,629 bytes)
96. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 03:08:51 -0400; I'd add that for LMR-600 you have to really hunt for UHF connectors. I did find some clamp type through Davis Electric that appear to work well. I did modify them though by opening up the internal re; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00415.html (10,773 bytes)
97. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: Mike <nf4l@nf4l.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 08:14:02 -0400; Is it folklore, or are N types inherently more weather resistant? 73, Mike NF4L _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00421.html (8,752 bytes)
98. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: Ryan Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 08:33:59 -0400; The N types have gasket built in so they are in fact more weather resistant. However I still used butyl tape + Electrical tape on my outdoor connections. Ryan, N2RJ -- Ryan A. Jairam, _______________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00423.html (9,598 bytes)
99. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: "D Calder" <towertalk@n4zkf.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 08:47:26 -0400; Exactly, correctly installed they are in fact weatherproof. But you are like I am, it gets 2" wide tape, them butyl, and then tape again. 73 Dave n4zkf The N types have gasket built in so they are in; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00425.html (10,269 bytes)
100. [TowerTalk] coax (score: 1): Author: "Craig Clark" <jcclark@radiusnorth.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:28:43 -0400; Message: 6 Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 08:33:59 -0400 From: Ryan Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Coax To: nf4l@nf4l.com, "Tower and HF antenna construction topics." <towertalk@contesti; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00431.html (9,136 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]