Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Coax\s+Arms\s+for\s+Tri\-Ex\s+Crank\-Up\s+Towers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Coax\s+Arms\s+for\s+Tri\-Ex\s+Crank\-Up\s+Towers\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Coax Arms for Tri-Ex Crank-Up Towers (score: 1): Author: "Larry Essary" <larry@pulse.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:28:50 -0500; Has anyone found an improved method for running coax down crank-up towers ? I have seen the fixed arms where the coax "accordions" as the tower comes down. I have been told that even with the tower f; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-10/msg00453.html (7,264 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax Arms for Tri-Ex Crank-Up Towers (score: 1): Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 04:12:27 -0700; Are you cost constrained? You could have a large spring loaded reel at the bottom that feeds/takes up the cable. One would want to choose a coax that is designed for repeated movement (yep, that Andr; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-10/msg00454.html (8,306 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax Arms for Tri-Ex Crank-Up Towers (score: 1): Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>; Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:03:51 -0600; Larry: I have been dealing with that problem for the past 10 days. I use a small Kellem type grip to hold four coax lines and one rotator line to the top coax arm. The grip is sized and I selected on; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-10/msg00456.html (11,243 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax Arms for Tri-Ex Crank-Up Towers (score: 1): Author: "Bill Winkis" <kc4pe@mindspring.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:02:40 -0400; On my LM-70 I use three cables up..Co-ax...Rotor control cable...Quad band Switching cable...these cables cut to length are taped together very carefully in a straight triangle with no crossovers....; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-10/msg00467.html (10,195 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]