Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Coax\s+as\s+powerline\s+\-\s+NOT\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Coax\s+as\s+powerline\s+\-\s+NOT\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Coax as powerline - NOT (score: 1): Author: "Jim Miller" <JimMiller@STL-OnLine.Net>; Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:32:08 -0500; I thought it would work fine also but was going to wait for other comments. Water, yes but same as other use for coax. BUT, let's take an extreme example, say 200 feet distance, and even 5 amp load.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00320.html (11,562 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax as powerline - NOT (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:10:25 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Not wanting to belabor the obvious, but this same issue exists in any two-wire AC mains system, not just one using coax. That is one reason (among others) why mo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00323.html (8,577 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax as powerline - NOT (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:02:08 -0700; Not that I want to encourage the use of coax for AC line power (I'm not too wild about the idea), but something that can also be considered here is that there could be isolation transformers in the s; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00333.html (9,787 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax as powerline - NOT (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:30:32 -0700; That violates all the building codes I know about. A mains power circuit must have a phase, a neutral, and an equipment ground (green wire), and they must follow the same path. Again, this is above a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00335.html (9,304 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax as powerline - NOT (score: 1): Author: "Roger $K8RI$" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:38:31 -0400; Amen! IF the ground side is really neutral an not ground. Those GFIs are almost unbelieveably fast, but don't work at all if the wiring isn't properly installed. I wish I had them in the house. Had; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00337.html (9,888 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax as powerline - NOT (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:53:22 -0700; I don't think you need a neutral (ground*ed* conductor).. two hots and ground will do. (three phase motors have three hots and a ground, for instance) And then, is a grounding conductor needed even f; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00345.html (10,258 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax as powerline - NOT (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:14:18 -0700; That's right, and I noted that in an earlier post -- a 240V circuit in the US does NOT require a neutral. But that's not the application -- the original poster was talking about 120V, which in North; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00391.html (11,549 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]