Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Coax\s+for\s+crankup\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Coax\s+for\s+crankup\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Coax for crankup (score: 1): Author: Saad.Mahaini@MCI.com (Saad Mahaini); Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1998 15:34 -0500 (CDT); Hello, What is the best, lowest loss, and highest flexibility coax for use on crankups and around rotors? 73s Saad KB6VIR/5 Dallas -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissio; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00243.html (8,057 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Coax for crankup (score: 1): Author: Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green); Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1998 17:18:44 -0400; Good question. I've asked this before, but didn't get a definitive answer. I tried LM400UF on my crankup and it wasn't flexible enough. I ended up with RG/213. 73, Dick, WC1M -- FAQ on WWW: http://ww; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00256.html (9,188 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Coax for crankup (score: 1): Author: n8ug@juno.com (n8ug@juno.com); Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1998 21:41:10 -0400; Hello, Saad - Actually, there are several, but they depend on how much loss you are willing to take and how you support and guide it down and up. The polyethylene jacketed coaxes are doing a great jo; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00264.html (10,056 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Coax for crankup (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com); Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1998 22:10:09 EDT; << Good question. I've asked this before, but didn't get a definitive answer. I tried LM400UF on my crankup and it wasn't flexible enough. I ended up with RG/213. >> I have had very good success with; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00265.html (8,370 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Coax for crankup (score: 1): Author: rrehr@epix.net (Roger Rehr); Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1998 22:27:59 -0400; I am using LMR600UF; a bundle of 4 cables plus rotor running up my 72 foot US Towers crankup. I crank it up and down each time I operate (fancy neighbors). No problems, but I don't do it remotely, as; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00273.html (10,029 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Coax for crankup (score: 1): Author: Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green); Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 00:48:29 -0400; I have the 72' base-rotated tubular version, which makes running the coax even more complicated. I crank it remotely from 250' away, and when the leaves are on the trees, I can't see it. After a nea; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00280.html (10,774 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Coax for crankup (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 01:17:33 EDT; this carry The renowned N6TV ("TV Bob" to his friends) uses a large fishing net to 'catch' his coax. This is one of those devices that has a handle and loop with the netting like you use to land a fi; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00284.html (8,943 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Coax for crankup (score: 1): Author: Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green); Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 02:12:53 -0400; to with one!). Steve, Any chance you could scan that picture and send it to me? Unfortunately, I have a feeling that method might not work very well for my rotating crankup -- if the tower is partly; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00286.html (10,234 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] Coax for crankup (score: 1): Author: n7ml@imt.net (Michael Lamb); Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 16:29:01 -0600; Hello Dick and all: I have for years used a very large black (for Uv) plastic garbage can to catch the coax from my 89 foot US Tower crank up tower. I am always careful to place the cover over the to; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00303.html (11,355 bytes)
10. [TowerTalk] Coax for crankup (score: 1): Author: w5robert@blkbox.com (Robert W5AJ); Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 23:52:37 -0500; I use both RG-213 and Flex 9913 on my crankup tube. A Wilson 77 footer. My coax is banded the length of the bottom section. It is connected to the top of each extension section on coax arm so when it; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00318.html (8,254 bytes)
11. [TowerTalk] Coax for crankup (score: 1): Author: Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green); Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 01:26:23 -0400; I have an old Wilson 77 manual and they recommended dressing the coax in loops as you did. But U.S. Tower told me not to do that on my 72' rotating motorized tubular. The current model of my tower ha; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00323.html (11,160 bytes)
12. [TowerTalk] Coax for crankup (score: 1): Author: w5robert@blkbox.com (Robert W5AJ); Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 22:03:53 -0500; Reply: Motorized up/down. Hand crank to tilt it over. No pull down. Somewhat staggered positioning on the support arms, mine are not Wilson made. The "loops" are ty-wrapped and taped so the coax(s) p; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00371.html (12,037 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]