Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Coax\s+in\s+Conduit\s+and\s+WATER\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Coax\s+in\s+Conduit\s+and\s+WATER\!\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Coax in Conduit and WATER! (score: 1): Author: jm@drsmesh.com (Joe E. Mesh); Date: 6 Jul 97 15:15; Some time ago... I read an Andrews publication about burial of coaxial transmission lines. In the publication they reccommended ONLY direct ground burial where burial was planned. Specifically they a; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00223.html (9,380 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Coax in Conduit and WATER! (score: 1): Author: broz@csn.net (John Brosnahan); Date: Sun, 6 Jul 1997 14:07:56 -0600 (MDT); In most situations I recommend direct burial without conduit. My experience with 100,000 ft of buried hardline (radio astronomy observatory) was that the only places that had problems were where a p; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00225.html (10,203 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Coax in Conduit and WATER! (score: 1): Author: patrickl@wco.com (Patrick Lynd); Date: Sun, 06 Jul 1997 13:08:50 -0700; Joe: Even seamless and joint less conduit gets wet on the inside. Water will always find a way in. Assuming that one could even find a way to prevent water from entering the conduit condensation will; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00226.html (9,776 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Coax in Conduit and WATER! (score: 1): Author: jm@drsmesh.com (Joe E. Mesh); Date: 6 Jul 97 17:15; locating all of the splices with the help of a TDR, digging them up and redoing them . << Gee... If you really mean hardline (and in radio astronomy I believe that you mean real hardline -- frequent; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00229.html (8,513 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Coax in Conduit and WATER! (score: 1): Author: broz@csn.net (John Brosnahan); Date: Sun, 6 Jul 1997 16:00:54 -0600 (MDT); Yep, I mean hardline--basic foam-filled 7/8 inch, 100 ohm stuff that was surplus. Not all radio astronomy is at microwaves. We did a lot of HF and low VHF radio astronomy--primarily Jupiter--Io effec; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00231.html (8,229 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Coax in Conduit and WATER! (score: 1): Author: dszymans@erols.com (Dan Szymanski); Date: Sun, 06 Jul 1997 20:45:23 -0700; I had a similiar experience at work. A moderate size multi 10 KW HF site, all antenna feed lines 1 5/8" Andrew foam. Because of orginial design specs,all feedlines were run in 2 1/2" black iron pipe.; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00236.html (10,516 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Coax in Conduit and WATER! (score: 1): Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com); Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 09:04:11 -0400; -- Forwarded by Tyler G Stewart/BENN/CEC on 07/07/97 09:04 AM -- Tyler G Stewart 07/07/97 09:03 AM While I direct-buried my hardlines to my first tower, I also buried a length of the 4" corrigated dr; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00243.html (12,553 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Coax in Conduit and WATER! (score: 1): Author: kc8pg@tir.com (Jim Vining); Date: Sun, 29 Jun 1997 15:09:37 -0700; The conduit doesn't always leak but there will be condensate build up no matter how you seal the conduit. Jim KC8PG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg01023.html (7,182 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]