Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Coax\s+specifications\,\s+etc\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Coax\s+specifications\,\s+etc\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Coax specifications, etc. (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 14:29:09 -0700; I just looked up the MIL spec MIL-C-17G (9 March 1990 + 1 supplement and 3 amendments) is the standard (I have it in pdf if anyone needs it) Interestingly, there is no such thing as Mil-Spec RG-213 o; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00574.html (9,411 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax specifications, etc. (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 19:00:50 -0400; or RG-58, since the early no longer buys spec. MIL-C-17/74C Not to whip a dead horse, but there is no standard testing spec used in cables that are NOT intended to be sold under mil spec. My point i; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00575.html (7,887 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax specifications, etc. (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 16:58:20 -0700; or RG-58, since the early no longer buys spec. MIL-C-17/74C Not to whip a dead horse, but there is no standard testing spec used in cables that are NOT intended to be sold under mil spec. My point is; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00580.html (9,925 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]